Comparison between the marginal integrity of a flowable Giomer and a conventional flowable resin when used as sealants for initially demineralized fissures. A randomized clinical - Egyptian Knowledge Bank

294794

Comparison between the marginal integrity of a flowable Giomer and a conventional flowable resin when used as sealants for initially demineralized fissures. A randomized clinical

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Overview Similar Items

Article

EVALUATION OF THE MARGINAL INTEGRITY OF BULK FILL FLOWABLE COMPOSITE VS GLASS IONOMER FOR CARIOUS CERVICAL RESTORATIONS: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL.

Article

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE VS CONVENTIONAL FLOWABLE COMPOSITE IN CERVICAL CARIOUS LESIONS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Article

Clinical Evaluation of Flowable versus Packable Bulk-Fill Giomer Restorative Materials: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Article

Sealing Ability of Flowable Resin Composites Fissure Sealants

Article

MARGINAL LEAKAGE EVALUATION OF GIOMER AND COMPOMER IN PRIMARY TEETH (IN-VITRO STUDY)

Thesis

Comparative Study of the Sealing ability of Twocommercially used flowable resin compositematerials

Article

A Comparative Evaluation of EQUIA Forte Microleakage Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Article

Evaluation of Giomer Pit and Fissure Sealant as Compared to Resin Based One

Article

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF NEW BIOACTIVE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL VERSUS HIGH VISCOSITY GLASS HYBRID REINFORCED GLASS IONOMER IN RESTORATION OF PROXIMAL LESIONS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TR

Article

Comparative evaluation of Giomer coating material Versus Icon resin infiltration in masking of White Spot Lesions (An In Vivo Study).