Comparing Accuracy Of Surgical Guides Fabricated By Additive Method (3D Printing) Versus Subtractive Method (Milling by CAD/CAM) for Prosthetically Driven Implant Placement “An I - Egyptian Knowledge Bank

357515

Comparing Accuracy Of Surgical Guides Fabricated By Additive Method (3D Printing) Versus Subtractive Method (Milling by CAD/CAM) for Prosthetically Driven Implant Placement “An I

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Overview Similar Items

Article

Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”

Article

Evaluation of Fracture Strength and Surface Topography of Interim Prosthodontics Fabricated Using 3D Printing Compared to CAD/CAM Systems (In-Vitro Study)

Article

Accuracy of two 3D printing technologies in manufacturing of dental implant surgical guides (An in vitro study)

Article

Accuracy of Two Digital Scanners (Intraoral, Extraoral) Compared to Conventional Impression Using Implant with Different Angulations (Zero, 15°,25°) “In-Vitro Study”

Article

Accuracy of teeth supported 3D printed versus CAD/CAM milled surgical guides used for dental implant placement (In-vitro study)

Article

3D Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Interim Crowns Fabricated using Conventional, Virtual and Three-Dimensional Printed Working Dies. (In Vitro Study).

Article

The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial)

Article

Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Impression Techniques in Construction of Digitally Printed Surgical Guide "In Vitro Study"

Article

ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES (AN INVITRO STUDY)

Article

Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study)