EFFECT OF PALATAL COVERAGE AND NUMBER OF MINI IMPLANTS USED TO ASSIST MAXILLARY OVERDENTURE: AN IN VITRO STUDY OF RETENTION, CYCLIC FATIGUE AND DEFORMATION OF MAXILLARY OVERDENTU

Retention Force of Maxillary Implant Retained palatlessOverdentureWith Equators versus Locators ( In Vitro Comparative Study)

COMPARISON BETWEEN SINGLE IMPLANT AND TWO IMPLANTS WITH LOCATOR ATTACHMENT RETAINING MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE (IN VITRO STUDY)

Comparison of marginal bone loss in mandibular overdentures supported by two solitary versus splinted mini-implants

Comparison of stud and telescopic crown attachments for mini-implant retained mandibular complete overdentures

Telescopic versus Bar attachments for three-implants assissed mandibular overdenture (Comparative study of retention)

“COMPARISON BETWEEN SURFACE TREATMENT AND IMPLANT STABILITY IN IMPLANT RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE” (IN VIVO STUDY)

RETENTION AND CHEWING EFFICIENCY OF TWO DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTIONS OF FOUR MINI-DENTAL IMPLANT IN MANDIBULAR IMPLANT RETAINED OVERDENTURES

Comparing the retention of the ball attachment retained mini-implant mandibular over denture using different retentive mechanisms. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparison of posterior residual ridge resorption in patients wearing conventional denture, two implant-retained mandibular overdenture and four implant-supported overdenture: a 5-year retrospective study.