This paper examines the concept of pseudo-reversible rings, introduced by Huang et al., as a generalization of reversible rings. We establish that pseudo-reversible rings are precisely the union of reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the results presented in the literature on pseudo-reversible rings are not novel but are direct derivations from established results on reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents.

This paper examines the concept of pseudo-reversible rings, introduced by Huang et al., as a generalization of reversible rings. We establish that pseudo-reversible rings are precisely the union of reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the results presented in the literature on pseudo-reversible rings are not novel but are direct derivations from established results on reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents.

This paper examines the concept of pseudo-reversible rings, introduced by Huang et al., as a generalization of reversible rings. We establish that pseudo-reversible rings are precisely the union of reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the results presented in the literature on pseudo-reversible rings are not novel but are direct derivations from established results on reversible rings and rings with trivial idempotents.