Beta
41498

Comparative study between different minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion

Thesis

Last updated: 06 Feb 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

OrthopedicSurgery

Advisors

El-Hadidi, Talaat T. , Atteya, Ahmad M. , Ahmad, Abd-Allah M.

Authors

Abdel-Qader, Husam-El-Din Aly

Accessioned

2017-07-12 06:40:26

Available

2017-07-12 06:40:26

type

M.Sc. Thesis

Abstract

This manipulation can lead to nerve damage or neurogenic pain. Additionally, PLIF usually is limited to L3–S1 because of the increased risk of damage to the conus medullaris and cauda equine resulting from the need for retraction above these levels. Recent evolution in minimally invasive techniques has generated much interest in the TLIF procedure, and has led spine surgeons to consider it to be less invasive

Issued

1 Jan 2012

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.21473/iknito-space/35435

Details

Type

Thesis

Created At

28 Jan 2023