Immediate implant placement after tooth extraction is becoming a common procedure in implant oral rehabilitation however; lack of primary full flap closure can jeopardize final results. Two surgical approaches that would enable predictable soft tissue closure. Aim: the aim of the study to evaluate clinically and radiographically the healing of the soft tissue wound and bone around implant placed immediately in freshly extraction sites after primary closure using full thickness rotated palatal flap as compared to split thickness rotated palatal flap. Materials &methods: the study will compromise10 patients equally and randomly divided into two groups in whom ten implants placed in fresh extraction sites of the maxillary canine-premolar area, no clinical signs of periapical pathosis nor any systemic contraindications for implant placement, heavy smokers(more than 10 cigarettes per day) are excluded from this study, the patients will be divided into two equal groups, group(A):the implant site will be covered primarily by full thickness posteriorly based palatal flap. In group(B): the implant site will be covered primarily by split thickness posteriorly based palatal flap. The implant: the implants to be used in this study are standard Sargon® expandable implant. Conclusion: immediateimplants placed in freshly extraction sites in maxillary canine-premolar region is acceptable approach preserving soft tissue and promoting bone healing and offers a predictable solution for tooth loss. Summary 79 | P a g e all clinical and radiographic results show no or slight differences in using full thickness or rotational palatal flap in coverage of immediate implants concerning soft tissue healing and bone growth around immediately placed implants