404881

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam Using Mucosal Atomization Device for Sedative Premedication in Preschool Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Article

Last updated: 09 Mar 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

Anaesthesia & Surgical Intensive Care

Abstract

Background: While several studies assessed the effects of variant sedative premedication for pediatrics to decrease anxiety and fearing of parental separation, but the conclusions were various. We aimed to compare intranasal dexmedetomidine with midazolam using mucosal atomization device (MAD) for preschool children scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a sedative premedication.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled double blind trial included 93 children who underwent MRI. They were randomly allocated into 3 groups (31 children in each one), Control group; intranasal 1ml 0.9% normal saline was given, Dexmedetomidine; group 2µg/kg dexmedetomidine was given intranasally and Midazolam group; 0.2 mg/kg midazolam was given intranasally using (MAD) in the three groups. After intra-nasal drug (IND) giving all patients were observed for 30 minutes before MRI and the sedation score 10,20,30 minutes following IND administration (primary outcome), , parental separation anxiety scale, acceptance of venous cannulation and adverse events were assessed.

Results: Regarding sedation score, there was significant difference among the studied groups (lower in dexmedetomidine group) with the difference is significant among each two individual groups 10, 20 and 30 minutes after IND administration (P=0.001). There were statistically significant difference among the studied groups regarding parental separation anxiety scale & acceptance of venous cannulation (better among dexmedetomidine group). The difference was significant between each two individual groups (P=0.001). . No adverse events.

Conclusion: Intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to intranasal midazolam given via MAD for sedative premedication for preschool children undergoing MRI, has a better sedation score, an easier parental separation and venous cannulation.

DOI

10.21608/zumj.2025.348788.3767

Keywords

intranasal, α2 Agonist, midazolam, Sedative, Pediatrics

Authors

First Name

Enas

Last Name

Abdelfattah

MiddleName

Ezzat

Affiliation

Department of anesthesia zagazig University

Email

e.ezat023@medicine.zu.edu.eg

City

Zagazig

Orcid

-

First Name

Zeinab

Last Name

Elhossary

MiddleName

Ibrahim

Affiliation

Department of anesthesia zagazig University

Email

amanyamin125@gmail.com

City

Zagazig

Orcid

-

First Name

Rania

Last Name

Kamel

MiddleName

Ahmed

Affiliation

Department of anesthesia zagazig University

Email

ranion8598@gmail.com

City

Zagazig

Orcid

-

First Name

Nahla

Last Name

Amin

MiddleName

Mohamed

Affiliation

Department of anesthesia zagazig University

Email

nahlaamin3@gmail.com

City

Zagazig

Orcid

-

Volume

31

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

53422

Issue Date

2025-03-01

Receive Date

2025-01-03

Publish Date

2025-03-01

Page Start

1,056

Page End

1,066

Print ISSN

1110-1431

Online ISSN

2357-0717

Link

https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/article_404881.html

Detail API

http://journals.ekb.eg?_action=service&article_code=404881

Order

6

Type

Original Article

Type Code

273

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Zagazig University Medical Journal

Publication Link

https://zumj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam Using Mucosal Atomization Device for Sedative Premedication in Preschool Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Details

Type

Article

Created At

09 Mar 2025