Beta
412798

Superior versus anterior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures: 6 months follow up (union rates, risks, and complications: hardware irritation and need for removal)

Article

Last updated: 25 Feb 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures is gaining popularity. The clavicle is a tubular bone with a flat lateral end. Open reduction and internal fixation could be achieved by the application of plates and screws either to the superior or anterior surface of the clavicle. However, there is no consensus in the literature to support one technique over the other. This study aims to compare the early functional and radiographic outcomes of anterior versus superior plating for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.
Patients and methods
From March 2021 to November 2022, a prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at our institute. We included all patients with isolated midshaft clavicle fractures. Thirty-six patients were randomized by the closed envelope technique, 18 were managed with superior plating (superior group), and the other 18 patients were managed using anterior plating (anterior group). All patients were followed up for 6 months. All patients were assessed clinically for union, range of motion, and functional scores. The secondary outcome measures included operative time, complications, hardware irritation, and the need for hardware removal or secondary procedure.
Results
The mean time to full union was 11.28 weeks in the anterior group and 11.72 weeks in the superior group. Mean constant shoulder score for the anterior group was 84.11 while for the superior group it was 82.67. No patients had skin and wound complications in the anterior group versus one patient in the superior group that got superficial infection successfully managed by repeated dressing and antibiotics. There was no statistically significant difference between superior and anterior plating regarding union, functional scores, return to ADLs, hardware problems, or complications.
Conclusion
Both superior and anterior plating of the clavicle fractures are safe treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, and they lead to similar functional outcomes, functional scores, and complication rates. Moreover, the selection of the technique of plating depends on surgeon preferences.

DOI

10.4103/eoj.eoj_50_23

Keywords

anterior plating and superior plating, clavicle fractures, hardware irritation

Authors

First Name

Ahmed M.H.

Last Name

El-Safty

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hesham

Last Name

Mesbah

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Begad

Last Name

Hesham

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Refaat

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

59

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

53923

Issue Date

2024-09-01

Receive Date

2023-04-01

Publish Date

2024-09-13

Page Start

274

Page End

278

Print ISSN

1110-1148

Online ISSN

2090-9926

Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/article_412798.html

Detail API

http://journals.ekb.eg?_action=service&article_code=412798

Order

412,798

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal

Publication Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Superior versus anterior plating of midshaft clavicle fractures: 6 months follow up (union rates, risks, and complications: hardware irritation and need for removal)

Details

Type

Article

Created At

25 Feb 2025