Beta
412797

The validity and reliability of CT scan based tibial plateau mapping for tibial plateau fractures

Article

Last updated: 25 Feb 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Introduction
The Schatzker and computed tomography (CT)-based three-column classifications are the most used for tibial plateau fractures. The newer “10-segment classification” suggested to have better fracture identification and more accurate planning. This study aimed to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this new classification and to clarify its validity in clinical practice.
Patients and methods
A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with tibial plateau fractures who were admitted to a university hospital through the period between January 2020 and December 2022 was done. Patients with complete preoperative imaging, including radiographs, CT scans with three-dimensional reconstruction, and postoperative radiographs were included. Missing imaging, open fractures, pathological fractures, conservative management, or definitive fixation by circular external fixator were excluded. Data were reviewed independently by three expert trauma surgeons twice with 2-week intervals with randomization of case sequencing to evaluate their interobserver and intraobserver reliability for the Schatzker, CT-based three-column, and the new 10-segment classifications. The validity of the 10-segment classification was assessed by the agreement on the approach and implant position suggested by the observers.
Results
Good interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found as regards the Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications on both intervals. Moderate and poor interobserver reliability “on both intervals respectively” and poor intraobserver reliability was found for the 10-segment classification. As regards the agreement on surgical approach on both time intervals, moderate and good interobserver agreements were found. For the implant position, poor interobserver agreement on both intervals was found. Intraobserver agreement for the surgical approach was good, while the intraobserver agreement for the implant position was moderate.
Conclusion
The Schatzker and CT-based three-column classifications are still more reliable than the newer 10-segment classification. This may be explained as it is still not familiar to surgeons and needs more training to be applied in clinical practice.

DOI

10.4103/eoj.eoj_43_24

Keywords

Tibial plateau fracture, Reliability, Validity, classification, Three-dimensional computed tomography

Authors

First Name

Radwan G.

Last Name

Metwaly

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hossam Saeed

Last Name

Diab

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed Nader

Last Name

Niaz

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

59

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

53923

Issue Date

2024-09-01

Receive Date

2024-04-21

Publish Date

2024-09-13

Page Start

266

Page End

273

Print ISSN

1110-1148

Online ISSN

2090-9926

Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/article_412797.html

Detail API

http://journals.ekb.eg?_action=service&article_code=412797

Order

412,797

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal

Publication Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

The validity and reliability of CT scan based tibial plateau mapping for tibial plateau fractures

Details

Type

Article

Created At

25 Feb 2025