Beta
412483

Conventional versus lateral cross-pinning (Dorgan’s technique) for fixation of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures

Article

Last updated: 25 Feb 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Although closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is the standard treatment for the displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures, controversy still exists regarding the optimal pin configuration. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the conventional versus lateral cross-pinning (Dorgan’s technique) in treatment of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.
Patients and methods
A total of 50 children were randomly divided into two equal groups: group I (treated via conventional technique) comprised 15 males and 10 female patients, with a mean age of 5.2±2.7 years, and group II (treated via Dorgan’s technique) comprised 17 males and eight female patients, with a mean age of 7.8±3.1 years. Preoperative and postoperative neurologic and radiological evaluations were performed. Functional and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated according to Flynn’s criteria. The mean follow-up periods were 25.24±7.2 and 27.56±6.3 months in groups I and II, respectively.
Results
There was no statistical significant difference between both groups regarding patients’ and fracture characteristics, postoperative protocol, union time, and complication rate (pin-tract infections and extensive granulation tissue formation around Kirschner wires). The radiological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in all patients, with no statistically significant difference between both groups. Dorgan’s technique was more time consuming than conventional cross-pinning, with no cases developing any iatrogenic neurological insult in such group; however, iatrogenic transient ulnar nerve injury occurred in one case in group I.
Conclusion
Both cross-pinning techniques provide a biomechanically stable fixation, allowing early and safe active elbow movements with satisfactory functional, cosmetic, and radiological outcomes, but Dorgan’s method was more time consuming compared with the conventional method. A properly performed Dorgan’s technique completely avoids the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury without endangering the radial nerve.

DOI

10.4103/eoj.eoj_72_18

Keywords

biomechanically stable fixation, cosmetic and radiological outcomes, pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures, postoperative iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, satisfactory functional

Authors

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Rizk

MiddleName

Shawkat

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mahmoud

Last Name

Kandil

MiddleName

Ibrahim

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

53

Article Issue

4

Related Issue

53894

Issue Date

2018-10-01

Publish Date

2018-10-01

Page Start

348

Page End

358

Print ISSN

1110-1148

Online ISSN

2090-9926

Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/article_412483.html

Detail API

http://journals.ekb.eg?_action=service&article_code=412483

Order

412,483

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal

Publication Link

https://eoj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Conventional versus lateral cross-pinning (Dorgan’s technique) for fixation of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures

Details

Type

Article

Created At

25 Feb 2025