Beta
378036

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF MAGNETIC MALLET VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING IMPLANT PLACEMENT PRO-TOCOL ON PERIIMPLANT OSSEOINTEGRATION IN ANTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION

Article

Last updated: 30 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

Abstract

Background: Implant osteotomy preparation traditionally involves drilling burs, which can cause mechanical trauma and bone necrosis. Magnetic Mallet osteotomy is an alternative minimally invasive technique that aims to be promote healing. New instruments using magneto-dynamic technology are being proposed for bone surgery, including dental implant site preparation.
This study aims: To evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet osteotomies versus conventional drill implant osteotomies on implant stability, bone density and marginal bone loss in anterior maxilla.
Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial was conducted on patients requiring dental implants to restore their unitary edentulous in the anterior maxilla. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups: study group (osteotomies with Magnetic Mallet) and control group (osteotomies with conventional drill system). The patients were clinically evaluated for primary stability and radiographically evaluated by CBCT immediate postoperatively and after 6 months to assess bone density and peri-implant bone height.
Results: The percentage change in bone density between immediate postoperative and after six months was significantly higher in the Magnetic Mallet group compared to the conventional drilling group. The stability ISQ comparison between immediately postoperative and four months postoperative revealed a significant increase in both groups, The average crestal bone loss six months postoperatively with no statistically significant difference between the two studied groups.
Conclusion: Compared to the traditional drill system, the Magnetic Mallet demonstrated superior osteointegration, a gradual reduction in pain, and a notable increase in postoperative implant stability.

DOI

10.21608/adjalexu.2024.260645.1461

Keywords

Implant, Low speed drilling, Magnetic mallet, primary stability, Heat generation

Authors

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Sanad

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

BDS, 2012, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Email

dr.ahmed.abdulazim.sanad@gmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Samraa

Last Name

Elsheikh

MiddleName

A.

Affiliation

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Email

drsamraaelsheikh@gmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Gaffar

Last Name

El Halawani

MiddleName

Nabil

Affiliation

department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry , Alexandria University , Alexandria ,Egypt

Email

gaafr.nabil@alexu.edu.eg

City

-

Orcid

0000-0001-9870-5022

Related Issue

-2

Receive Date

2024-01-04

Publish Date

2024-09-03

Print ISSN

1110-015X

Online ISSN

2536-9156

Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_378036.html

Detail API

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=378036

Order

1

Type

Original Article

Type Code

1,057

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Alexandria Dental Journal

Publication Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF MAGNETIC MALLET VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING IMPLANT PLACEMENT PRO-TOCOL ON PERIIMPLANT OSSEOINTEGRATION IN ANTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION

Details

Type

Article

Created At

30 Dec 2024