This study presents a comparative analysis of the AI-generated poem “Ode to War" and Wilfred Owen's renowned anti-war poem “Dulce et Decorum Est". By examining these two works, we explore the capabilities and limitations of AI in creative writing, particularly in the realm of poetry. The comparison highlights the AI's ability to generate content using common poetic forms and employ poetic devices, creating evocative descriptions. However, the study reveals that AI poetry often lacks the emotional depth and subjective creativity that human-authored works possess. The findings indicate that while AI can assist in writing poetry and analyze texts, it struggles to capture the full complexity of human experiences and emotions. The AI's poem, "Ode to War," presents a more idealized and abstract view of war, focusing on its destructive nature, while Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est" offers a powerful and personal portrayal of the horrors and futility of conflict. The study contributes to the understanding of AI's role in literary creativity, emphasizing the importance of emotional authenticity and subjective interpretation in poetry. It highlights the need for future research to focus on enhancing AI's emotional depth and cultural sensitivity to create more resonant and ethically responsible AI-generated poetry.