Subjects
-Abstract
Aim: to measure the accuracy of brackets transfer with two indirect bonding
techniques using three dimensional scanning Subjects and Methods: Two hundred
brackets were bonded to twenty subjects (upper arch) receiving orthodontic treatments.
Orthodontic brackets were placed on the casts with a specific water soluble adhesive
in group 1 (traditional group) and digitally positioned by (3-Shap) software in group 2
(digital group). After bracket placement, three dimensional scans of the casts obtained.
Two types of transfer trays were fabricated, and used to bracket transfer to patient's
teeth. After bracket transfer another three dimensional scans of the subjects obtained.
The teeth on one model will be then digitally superimposed to the corresponding teeth
on the other model. All data collected will be tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Results: The indirect bonding methods for both groups that were used in this study
were accurate and reliable within acceptable limits with directional bias especially
toward gingival direction. Conclusion: Traditional techniques with vacuum formed
trays were significantly less accurate than digital technique with 3-D printed trays in
the Occluso-gingival direction.
DOI
10.21608/aadj.2023.296427
Keywords
Transfer accuracy, Indirect bonding, Bracket, 3D scanning, orthodontic
Authors
MiddleName
-Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry
Al-Azhar University
(Asyut branch)
Email
mustafadawaba1425.el@azhar.edu.eg
Orcid
-Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry
Al-Azhar University
(Asyut branch)
Email
-City
-Orcid
-Affiliation
Orthodontic Department,
Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar
University, Asyut, Egypt
Email
-City
-Orcid
-Link
https://aadj.journals.ekb.eg/article_296427.html
Detail API
https://aadj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=296427
Publication Title
Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal
Publication Link
https://aadj.journals.ekb.eg/
MainTitle
A Comparison between Traditional Method of Bracket Transfer and Computer Aided Method by Indirect Bonding Technique