Beta
298719

Measurement of the Thickness of the Lower Part of the Uterine Wall before Childbirth Using 2D and 3D Ultrasound across the Abdomen after Previous Cesarean Section

Article

Last updated: 03 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: The most frequent gynecological procedure, caesarean section (CS), is linked to the advantages and disadvantages of elective repeat caesarean (ERC) and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Recent research has revealed that VBAC is less safe than previously thought due to an elevated risk of problems that may be associated to lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness. The LUS has been measured with ultrasound (US) using a variety of methods, including transabdominal (TA) and transvaginal procedures. The LUS thickness may be measured more precisely using 3D US than 2D US.Objective: The aim of the current study was to use 2D and 3D ultrasonography across the abdomen following previous CS to gauge the lower uterine wall's thickness before childbirth. Patients and methods: A cross sectional study was carried out at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University of Boys, from November 2021 to November 2022. The study included pregnant women, aged more than 18 years old, with gestational age between 37 and 39 weeks, with past history of one CS. Multiparous women, pregnant women with polyhydramnios or placenta previa were excluded. All participants were subjected to full history taking and thorough complete clinical examination. Ultrasound exams were carried out using a device with a 4-8 MHz transducer for 2D and 3D volume scanning. Results: The best cutoff value for 2D US was 3.91 mm with an AUC of 0.742, and this resulted in significant diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 69.3%, PPV 77.8%, and NPV 75%. The mean LUS thickness by 2D transabdominal US was 6.74 1.52 mm, while by 3D transabdominal US it was 5.86 1.43 mm. Conclusion: Thickness of the lower portion of the uterine wall may be precisely measured before delivery using both 2D and 3D ultrasonography, with 3D ultrasound having a better degree of accuracy. Obstetricians can still use 2D ultrasound in locations without 3D technology.  

DOI

10.21608/ejhm.2023.298719

Keywords

Caesarean section, Lower uterine segment thickness, 2D ultrasound, 3D ultrasound, Cross sectional study, Al-Azhar University

Authors

First Name

Tamer

Last Name

Elsayed

MiddleName

Salah

Affiliation

Obstetrics and gynecology faculty of medicine al azhar University

Email

drtamersalahyosif@gmail.com

City

Cairo

Orcid

-

First Name

Abdelrahman Ragab

Last Name

Rashed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Elsayed Mohammed

Last Name

Ibrahim

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

91

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

40609

Issue Date

2023-04-01

Receive Date

2023-05-12

Publish Date

2023-04-01

Page Start

4,667

Page End

4,671

Print ISSN

1687-2002

Online ISSN

2090-7125

Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_298719.html

Detail API

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=298719

Order

140

Type

Original Article

Type Code

606

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

Publication Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Measurement of the Thickness of the Lower Part of the Uterine Wall before Childbirth Using 2D and 3D Ultrasound across the Abdomen after Previous Cesarean Section

Details

Type

Article

Created At

24 Dec 2024