Introduction: Prefabricated zirconia crowns have many merits when compared to Stainless Steel Crowns (SSCs). The high cost and duration of the crown are among the most prominent disadvantages that hinder the wide range of use of the latter.
Methods: This cross sectional study included a questionnaire sent to pediatric dentists to request the parents of their child patients to fill in via email. The questionnaire consisted of six sections: Type of Crown, Personal Data and Sociodemographic, Parental Satisfaction, Cost Effectiveness, Longevity and Potential Difficulty Experienced.
Results: There was no difference in the overall satisfaction between the groups in terms of gender distribution and parent/guardian occupation and education. There was SSCs lower satisfaction with SSC compared to zirconia crown regarding color. There was no difference in satisfactions with crown shape between the two groups. For size and number of visits, SSCs showed higher satisfaction than zirconia crown. Higher percentage of parents reported that SSCs have reasonable price while zirconia crowns are expensive. SSCs showed higher stability for less than 6 months and from 6-12 months while that of zirconia crowns could last for more than 12 months. Zirconia crown showed higher prevalence of bleeding and food accumulation compared to SSCs. There was no difference between the two groups regarding tooth sensitivity.
Conclusion: There is increasing demand for aesthetic restoration of deciduous teeth in the field of pediatric dentistry. Most parents prefer zirconia crowns when compared to SSCs, and they recommend this type for others despite its high cost.