Beta
388443

Degree of cervical mobility differs or not when using alternative way of intubation: Intubating laryngeal mask or classic laryngoscope

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Spine surgery needs a special consideration as regards minimizing the movement during intubation to avoid the hazards to spinal cord. The present study aims to highlight the preferable technique for cervical intubation. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA, Fastrach™ laryngeal mask company, Henle-on-Thomes, U.K.) is a supraglottic device specially designed to be an effective ventilator device and blind intubation guide in patient with normal and abnormal airways.
Methods
40 patients were involved and randomly assigned to two equal groups according to the used technique of endotracheal intubation: (Group 1): Intubating Laryngeal Mask technique and (Group 2): Direct laryngoscopy technique. Anesthesia was induced using a combination of 1 μg/kg fentanyl, 5 mg/kg thiopental sodium (sleeping dose) and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg (Intubating laryngeal Mask or the Macintosh blade) was used to secure the airway according to the patient group. Meanwhile a continuous videofluoroscopy was recorded. The radiographs were analyzed for movements in the cervical segments C1/2 and C2/3. A reference line was drawn following the dorsal alignment of C2. Another two lines, one connecting the anterior and posterior arch of C1, and one through the basal plate of C3, were drawn to transect the above mentioned reference line.
Results
The mean cervical spine extension at C1/C2 was 77.2 ± 3.5 before intubation, 74.8 ± 4.3 during intubation, and 75.9 ± 4.2 after intubation for group 1, while it was 74.95 ± 4 before, 65.9 ± 4.4 during, and 68.75 ± 3.9 after intubation for group 2 there was statistically significant difference between LMA group (group 1) and direct laryngoscopy group (group 2) in the motion of cervical spine extension at C1/C2 during and after intubation where the -value was <0.05.
Conclusion
The ILM (Fastrach) is a satisfactory alternative to the currently used methods of airway management in cervical spine injuries and reduces movement of the cervical spine.

DOI

10.1016/j.egja.2016.04.006

Authors

First Name

Hisham Salah Mohamed

Last Name

Khedr

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Gomaa Zahry

Last Name

Hussein

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Nesrine Essam Eldin Abd

Last Name

Elsalam

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Magda Saleh

Last Name

Rezk

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

32

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

51196

Issue Date

2016-07-01

Receive Date

2015-03-01

Publish Date

2016-07-01

Page Start

309

Page End

314

Print ISSN

1110-1849

Online ISSN

1687-1804

Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/article_388443.html

Detail API

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=388443

Order

388,443

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

Publication Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Degree of cervical mobility differs or not when using alternative way of intubation: Intubating laryngeal mask or classic laryngoscope

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024