Beta
388380

Dexmedetomidine versus Nefopam for the management of post-spinal anesthesia shivering: A randomized double-blind controlled study

Article

Last updated: 31 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
This study is designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine and nefopam for control of intraoperative shivering following spinal anesthesia.
Materials and methods
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted on 100 ASA grade I and II patients of either sex, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries, under spinal anesthesia. Patients who developed post-spinal anesthesia shivering of grade 3 or 4 were included in the study, and randomly allocated to one of two groups, group D ( = 50), received Dexmedetomidine in a dose of 0.5 μg/kg diluted in 10 ml isotonic saline slowly I.V. (one minute duration), and group N ( = 50), received Nefopam in a dose of 0.15 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml isotonic saline slowly I.V. (one minute duration) when shivering was observed. Time taken for control of shivering, response rate, recurrence rate, hemodynamics, time to first request of rescue analgesic, one-patient cost and adverse effects were recorded.
Results
The time taken for control of shivering was statistically significantly shorter in Nefopam group (group N) compared with dexmedetomidine group (group D). The average time taken for disappearance of shivering was 2.35 ± 0.67 min in group N compared with group D (4.63 ± 1.19 min) ( = 0.041). Patients with incomplete response were more in group D (two patients in group D compared with nil in group N), but not statistically significant and recurrence rate was one patient in group D compared with nil in group N. Time to first request to rescue analgesic was significantly prolonged in group N (351.24 ± 19.71 min) compared with group D (192.63 ± 9.08 min). One-patient cost was significantly lesser in group N (about two £/patient) compared with group D (about 168 £/patient). Adverse effects such as bradycardia, hypotension and sedation were observed in Dexmedetomidine group, while pain at injection was noted in Nefopam group.
Conclusion
Nefopam is better as compared to dexmedetomidine for control of intraoperative shivering under spinal anesthesia due to its rapid onset, higher response rate, no sedation, lesser hemodynamic alterations, lesser requirements of rescue analgesics and lesser costs.

DOI

10.1016/j.egja.2015.06.004

Authors

First Name

Sameh Mohammed

Last Name

Osman

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

31

Article Issue

4

Related Issue

51192

Issue Date

2015-10-01

Receive Date

2015-03-08

Publish Date

2015-10-01

Page Start

315

Page End

320

Print ISSN

1110-1849

Online ISSN

1687-1804

Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/article_388380.html

Detail API

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=388380

Order

388,380

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

Publication Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Dexmedetomidine versus Nefopam for the management of post-spinal anesthesia shivering: A randomized double-blind controlled study

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024