Beta
388113

Comparison between continuous posterior and lateral interscalene brachial plexus blockades for major shoulder surgery

Article

Last updated: 31 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery is extremely challenging. Continuous interscalene blockade is considered a well suited pain management technique for this type of surgery, but with technical difficulties. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous posterior and conventional lateral interscalene brachial plexus blockades.
Methods
This prospective randomized study included 40 patients who were radomally allocated into two equal groups ( = 20 patients), in the first group, continuous lateral interscalene blockade was done (Lateral Group), while continuous posterior interscalene was performed in the second group (Posterior Group). The measurement data were patient characteristics and surgical data, easiness of catheter insertion, onset of blockade, catheter insertion and total blockade times. Side effects encountered during blockade and postoperative efficacy of analgesia as well as patients satisfaction were also measured.
Results
There was no significant difference as regards the onset of anesthesia in both groups. Block procedure time and catheter placement times were faster in the posterior group (6.6 ± 0.64 vs 9.6 ± 1.1 min;  < .05 and 1.6 ± 0.7 vs 4.3 ± 0.7 min;  < 0.05 respectively). Successful catheter insertion was higher in the posterior group (19 patients vs 15 patients in the lateral group). Easy catheter insertion were significantly higher in the posterior group (16 patients vs eight patients In the lateral group;  < 0.05). Technical adverse effects related to catheter insertion were significantly higher in the lateral group (nine patients vs only one patient in the posterior group;  < 0.05). Complications were comparable in both groups. Postoperative efficacy of analgesia and Patient’s satisfaction about catheter placement was higher in the posterior group.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we demonstrated a high success rate, low systemic and technical adverse effects, and better catheter compliance with continuous posterior interscalene blockade.

DOI

10.1016/j.egja.2011.06.002

Keywords

brachial, Plexus, Interscalene, block, Continuous, Approach

Authors

First Name

Mohamed M.

Last Name

Tawfeek

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed A.

Last Name

Hassanin

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

27

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

51171

Issue Date

2011-07-01

Receive Date

2011-04-10

Publish Date

2011-07-01

Page Start

169

Page End

172

Print ISSN

1110-1849

Online ISSN

1687-1804

Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/article_388113.html

Detail API

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=388113

Order

388,113

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

Publication Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Comparison between continuous posterior and lateral interscalene brachial plexus blockades for major shoulder surgery

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024