Beta
388030

The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Concerning patients with suspected cervical spine (C-spine) fractures or other cervical pathologies, tracheal intubation must be done very carefully to avoid injury to the spinal cord.
Methods
Fifty-two patients within a range of 20–60 years old, and arranged for elective surgery, were indiscriminately allocated into two groups; Group S was intubated with the C MAC Videostylet (VS), whereas Group L was intubated by D blade Video Laryngoscope (VL) during cervical immobilization by Philadelphia collar. The first successful attempt duration, total number of intubation attempts, the total duration of the intubation, haemodynamic parameters, stress response of intubation, the degree of C-spine movement and complications were evaluated in both groups.
Results
Group L showed substantially shorter times for the first successful attempt (p-value <0.001) and the whole intubation procedure (p-value <0.001) compared to Group S. Group S had a significantly more total number of intubation attempts (p-value = 0.010). The haemodynamic parameters did not significantly differ throughout the measurements among groups. Regarding the blood cortisol measurements at different periods, there were statistically insignificant changes among the groups. Concerning the greatest alteration in C-spine angulation at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments during laryngoscopy and intubation, there were statistically insignificant differences among groups.
Conclusion
The C MAC D-blade VL is superior to the VS in terms of the number and duration of intubation attempts during C-spine immobilization. Conversely, the VS showed comparable results to the D blade regarding C-spine motion and stress response.

DOI

TEJA-2024-0058

Keywords

Tracheal intubation and cervical spine movement, cervical spine injury, cervical immobilization, video stylet, D blade video laryngoscope

Authors

First Name

Adel Said Mohammed

Last Name

Anany

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Emad Eldin Abd El Monem

Last Name

Arida

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Magda Mohamed Abo

Last Name

Oll

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hossam El-Din Fouad

Last Name

Rida

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Eman Ahmed Mohamed

Last Name

El-Attar

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Adel Ibrahim

Last Name

Hozien

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

40

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

51165

Issue Date

2024-12-01

Receive Date

2024-02-22

Publish Date

2024-12-31

Page Start

308

Page End

316

Print ISSN

1110-1849

Online ISSN

1687-1804

Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/article_388030.html

Detail API

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=388030

Order

388,030

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

Publication Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024