Beta
387692

Erector spinae plane block combined with general anaesthesia versus conventional general anaesthesia in lumbar spine surgery

Article

Last updated: 29 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Perioperative pain management should be planned preoperatively and based on usage of pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities as a multimodal analgesia (MMA). Regional anaesthesia has superior advantages than opioid-based anaesthesia and is one of the cornerstones of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) especially in Patients undergoing spine surgery having already troublesome chronic pain and analgesic use. The present study was carried out to compare erector spinae plane block (ESP) with general anaesthesia versus conventional general anaesthesia in lumbar spine surgery.
Materials and Methods
This study was done on thirty adult patients of both sexes scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly categorized into two equal groups (fifteen patients each); ESP was used for group I, and MMA was used for group II. Data was collected on anaesthetic requirements based on entropy monitoring and haemodynamic parameters, stress response measurement based on serum cortisol and blood glucose levels, controlled hypotensive anaesthesia; various drugs required and doses given, intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, postanaesthesia care unit data concerning recovery.
Results
The group I (ESP) had statistically significant decrease of the response and the response-state entropy difference levels when compared to the group II (MMA) after stimulus and during the 1st time interval. The incidence of hemodynamic changes was significantly higher in the group I (ESP) than group II (MMA). Only the serum cortisol but not the blood glucose levels had statistically significant lower mean values 4 h postoperatively in group I (ESP) compared to group II (MMA). The patients received ESP had statistically significant lower mean expired isoflurane concentration, decreased emergence time, intraoperative fentanyl consumption and total dose of pethidine given up to 8 hrpostoperatively.
Conclusions
Erector spinae plane block (ESP) can be considered safe and effective perioperative analgesic modality for lumbar spine simple decompression surgery. It helps in controlled hypotensive anaesthetic technique and decreases inhalational anaesthetics and intraoperative opioid requirements.

DOI

TEJA-2020-0070

Keywords

Erector spinae plane block (ESP), multimodal analgesia (MMA)

Authors

First Name

Ezzzt M.

Last Name

Siam

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Doaa M.

Last Name

Abo Aliaa

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Sally

Last Name

Elmedany

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed E.

Last Name

Abdelaa

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

36

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

51157

Issue Date

2020-01-01

Receive Date

2020-07-03

Publish Date

2020-01-01

Page Start

201

Page End

226

Print ISSN

1110-1849

Online ISSN

1687-1804

Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/article_387692.html

Detail API

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=387692

Order

387,692

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

Publication Link

https://egja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Erector spinae plane block combined with general anaesthesia versus conventional general anaesthesia in lumbar spine surgery

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024