Beta
365056

Laparoscopic exploration versus conservative treatment in stable blunt abdominal trauma patients

Article

Last updated: 21 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Laparoscopy is now a standard procedure in general surgery, and as technique and equipment advance, more complicated procedures are being carried out using this minimally invasive approach. With less patient morbidity, postoperative complications, and recovery time than open procedures, laparoscopic surgery aims to offer equal or better visualisation. Numerous laparoscopic procedures, such as cholecystectomy, gastroesophageal reflux procedures, and diagnostic laparoscopy, have demonstrably achieved this goal. Despite the advantages of laparoscopy in the trauma population, its complexity and potential hemodynamic instability due to intra-abdominal injury typically prevent its use. This cutting-edge technology may help carefully chosen trauma patients. According to estimates, 10% of all deaths worldwide were due to trauma.
Methods
This prospective study included 29 patients with history of blunt abdominal trauma and vitally stable following initial resuscitation admitted to Casualty and Emergency Unit, ainshams university hospitals and Elzhor Hospital port said, during the period from June 2022 to December 2022.
Results
The patients in study were 21 males (82 % of total) 10 males in (LE) representing approximately 77 % and 11 males in conservative group representing approximately (87 %), and 8 females (18 % of total) 2 females in (LE) and 6 in conservative group. As Regarding the hospital stay, in this study, the patients managed by (LE) had shorter hospital stay in relation to those managed conservatively, as the patients results revealed that the overall hospital stay for (LE) was significantly shorter, with an average of 5.69 ± 1.887 days. In this study, the group that benefit the most from shortening the hospital stay was the patients with haemoperitonium with no definite injuries, followed by patients with splenic injuries, while differences in hospital stay in patients with hepatic injuries were not significant. All patients had access to follow-up information for three months after discharge. There were no infective or late hemorrhagic complications observed.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic exploration was found to be most beneficial in patients with blunt abdominal trauma who had a CT scan that revealed haemoperitonium but no organ injuries., and to less extent in cases with splenic injuries, while there was no significant data favoring (LE) on conservative treatment in patients with hepatic injuries.

DOI

10.4103/ejs.ejs_201_23

Keywords

laparoscopic exploration, conservative treatment, Stable Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Authors

First Name

Abdelkader A. Abdelatif

Last Name

Mohammed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Khalied H.

Last Name

Gad

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Amr M. M.

Last Name

El-hefny

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Ahmed S.

Last Name

Saad

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

42

Article Issue

4

Related Issue

48973

Issue Date

2023-12-01

Receive Date

2023-09-05

Publish Date

2023-12-07

Print ISSN

1110-1121

Online ISSN

1687-7624

Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/article_365056.html

Detail API

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=365056

Order

365,056

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Publication Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Laparoscopic exploration versus conservative treatment in stable blunt abdominal trauma patients

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024