364939

Plain uncoated balloon versus drug-coated balloon in the management of in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal lesions: a comparative study of the effect of lesion length on the o

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Aim
To compare the effectiveness of plain balloon and drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the management of in-stent restenosis (ISR) of femoropopliteal lesions regarding reocclusion rate and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Patients and methods
A retrospective study was carried out on 31 patents complaining of critical limb ischemia, Rutherford categories 4 or 5, due to femoropopliteal ISR during the period from June 2018 to June 2020 at Sohag University Hospitals and 6 October Insurance Hospital, Cairo. Patients were managed by one of two different modalities: group A, where patients were managed by DCB, and group B, where patients were managed by plain balloon. In each group, according to the lesion length of the ISR, patients were classified into long lesions (>10 cm) and short lesions (<10 cm). Recurrent occlusion and TLR were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Results
Group A consisted of 19 patients, with 11 long lesions and eight short lesions, whereas group B consisted of 12 patients, with five long lesions and seven short lesions. In short lesions, reocclusion was recorded in 12.5% (1/8 patients) of the DCB group compared with 57.1% (4/7 patients) in the plain balloon group (≤0.001), whereas in long lesions, the reocclusion was recorded in 36.4% (4/11 patients) of the DCB group compared with 60% (3/5 patients) (=0.65). TLR was recorded in two patients of plain balloon group, whereas no cases were reported in the DCB group in short lesions, whereas in long lesions, four cases developed TLR [two (18.2%) cases of DCB group and two (40%) cases of plain balloon group). Regarding TLR results, the performance of DCB in ISR differs significantly in short lesions compared with long lesions (≤0.05).
Conclusion
DCB angioplasty offers an effective outcome in the management of femoropopliteal ISR, especially in short lesions. However, in long lesions, it yields higher but insignificant results compared with plain balloon angioplasty. Long-term results of management of ISR in long lesions are awaited irrespective of the technology used.

DOI

10.4103/ejs.ejs_335_21

Keywords

drug-coated balloon, femoropopliteal, in-stent restenosis, plain balloon

Authors

First Name

Osama A.

Last Name

Ismail

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Radwan

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Khaled M.A.

Last Name

Elhindawy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

41

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

48967

Issue Date

2022-10-01

Receive Date

2021-11-04

Publish Date

2022-10-10

Print ISSN

1110-1121

Online ISSN

1687-7624

Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/article_364939.html

Detail API

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=364939

Order

364,939

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Publication Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Plain uncoated balloon versus drug-coated balloon in the management of in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal lesions: a comparative study of the effect of lesion length on the o

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024