Beta
364734

The role of laparoscopy in the management of patients with isolated blunt abdominal trauma

Article

Last updated: 21 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Objective
To assess the role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and management of patients with isolated blunt abdominal trauma (IBAT).
Patients and methods
This was a prospective study of 50 patients who were hemodynamically stable (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) experiencing IBAT who underwent diagnostic and/or therapeutic laparoscopy at the emergency department of Sohag University Hospital. Inclusion criteria were hemodynamically stable patients with IBAT. Exclusion criteria were marked hemodynamic instability, penetrating abdominal trauma, polytraumatized patients, increased intracranial tension, and contraindications for laparoscopy. After a primary survey according to Advanced Trauma Life Support principles, all patients were investigated by pelvi-abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, chest and abdominal plain radiograph, and other routine laboratory investigations.
Results
A total of 50 stable patients with IBAT underwent urgent laparoscopy. Of them, 32 (64%) patients had therapeutic laparoscopy, whereas 18 (36%) patients had diagnostic laparoscopy. A total of 18 (36%) patients were converted to therapeutic laparotomy. Severely damaged spleen, liver, small intestinal, colon, and stomach injuries were the causes of conversion. Road traffic accident (24%) was the commonest cause of injury. Spleen was the commonest affected organ [18 (36%) patients], followed by the liver [10 (20%) patients]. Pain (visual analog scale of pain) and hospital stay were significantly increased (<0.0001and 0.001, respectively) in converted (laparotomy) cases in comparison with nonconverted (completed laparoscopy) cases. Postoperative complications, such as wound infection, hematoma, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, wound dehiscence, and reexploration were significantly increased in converted cases in comparison with nonconverted cases (=0.002, 0.01, 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
Laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma is safe, accurate, and feasible. Hemodynamic stability of the patient and surgical expertise in advanced laparoscopy are the prerequisites. The most important advantages of laparoscopy are reduction of nontherapeutic laparotomy rate, reduction of operative period, shortening of hospital stay, and reduction of postoperative pain and postoperative complications.

DOI

10.4103/ejs.ejs_371_20

Keywords

isolated blunt abdominal trauma, Laparoscopy, laparotomy

Authors

First Name

Abd-El-Aal A.

Last Name

Saleem

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Emad A.

Last Name

Ahmed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mena

Last Name

Zarif Helmy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

40

Article Issue

2

Related Issue

48965

Issue Date

2021-10-01

Receive Date

2020-12-29

Publish Date

2021-10-12

Print ISSN

1110-1121

Online ISSN

1687-7624

Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/article_364734.html

Detail API

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=364734

Order

364,734

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Publication Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

The role of laparoscopy in the management of patients with isolated blunt abdominal trauma

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024