Beta
364779

Randomized comparative study to compare between conventional surgical ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of venous ulcers

Article

Last updated: 29 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
This comparative study compared the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the great saphenous vein versus conventional surgery in healing of venous ulcers.
Aim
This study aimed to analyze the benefits of RFA of the great saphenous vein versus conventional surgery in the healing of venous ulcers.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective comparative study involving 40 patients, carried out in the Vascular Surgery Department at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Ahmed Maher Hospital in Cairo with follow-up at 2, 4, and 6 months. Here, we present the early follow-up outcomes of both treatment modalities and more follow-up time will be needed to confirm the results of this study. This study included 40 patients, 20 patients for conventional surgery (group A) and 20 patients for conventional RFA (group B) suffering from primary varicose veins with venous ulcers. The mean age was 29.15 years for group A and 28.45 years for group B; of these, 28 (70%) patients were males.
Results
There was no statistical difference between great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping and RFA in terms of age. Both treatment modalities are equally effective according to improvement and decrease in linical, etiological, anatomical and pathophysiological classification (CEAP) clinical class and venous clinical severity scores. RFA required less time in the operation room in comparison with stripping. Also, RFA needed a stay of a few hours in the hospital, while almost all patients who underwent stripping were discharged the next day.
Conclusion
The present study confirmed that both surgery and RFA are highly effective. Both resulted in a significant decrease in venous ulcer size and improvement in the objective severity of venous disease (venous clinical severity scores and venous disability score). RFA is less time consuming than stripping in terms of operation time and hospital stay. Successful treatment of venous ulcer results in significant improvements of quality-of-life. RFA causes less postprocedure pain than surgery and allows early return to work and normal activities.

DOI

10.4103/ejs.ejs_85_21

Keywords

CEAP classification, healing of venous ulcers, radiofrequency ablation of GSV, stripping and ligation of GSV

Authors

First Name

Abdel R.

Last Name

Mohamed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Refaat R.

Last Name

Kamel

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed R.

Last Name

Abdelhakim

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

40

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

48964

Issue Date

2022-01-01

Receive Date

2021-03-15

Publish Date

2022-01-11

Print ISSN

1110-1121

Online ISSN

1687-7624

Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/article_364779.html

Detail API

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=364779

Order

364,779

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Publication Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Randomized comparative study to compare between conventional surgical ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of venous ulcers

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024