364555

Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Gallstones remain one of the commonest surgical problems in the developed world, and despite major therapeutic advances in recent years, there has been no progress in the prevention of gallstone development, and it may lead to serious complications that may affect patients’ quality of life. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy currently is accepted as the gold standard treatment of gallstones. The advantages of such a surgical approach have been reported by a number of authors, showing both the positive effect of this method on the postoperative quality of life of the patients and its optimal short-term and long-term results.
Objective
To assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasonic energy as a single alternative tool in the dissection of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Patients and methods
This is a prospective study that included 60 patients with gallbladder stones who were operated upon for laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 1 year starting from August 2016 till August 2017. Approval from the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, was obtained before commencement of this study. The patients upon whom the study was based were operated on in El Demerdash Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital.
Results
A total of 60 patients were included in this study. Group A included 30 patients for whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy had been done using a harmonic scalpel. Group B included 30 patient for whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy had been done using electrocautery tools (hook, grasper, and scissors) and surgical clips. For both groups, data were collected and analyzed: demographic data (sex, age, BMI, comorbidities, and previous surgeries).
Conclusion
The main advantages of ultrasonic dissection include the following: (a) utilization of a single instrument for both dissection of the gallbladder and dissection of the artery and dust, (b) shorter operating time, and (c) improved laparoscopic view and possibly a reduction of postoperative pain. The main disadvantage of ultrasonic dissection is instrument cost, which is particularly high if the surgical unit is equipped with reusable instruments.

DOI

10.4103/1115-2613.278265

Keywords

cystic artery, Cystic duct, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Authors

First Name

Mahmoud A.

Last Name

Mahmoud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Heba T.A.

Last Name

Aziz El-Atar

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

39

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

48958

Issue Date

2020-02-01

Receive Date

2019-05-09

Publish Date

2020-02-14

Print ISSN

1110-1121

Online ISSN

1687-7624

Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/article_364555.html

Detail API

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=364555

Order

364,555

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery

Publication Link

https://ejsur.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Details

Type

Article

Created At

21 Dec 2024