Beta
359657

Use of dexemedetomidine–fentanyl versus midazolam–fentanyl for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation: a randomized double-blind controlled study

Article

Last updated: 29 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background and objective
Sedation for awake fiberoptic intubation is considered a great challenge for anesthetist to maintain patient’s airway patent during sedation. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine–fentanyl versus midazolam–fentanyl combination on patient’s ventilation during sedation for awake fiberoptic intubation.
Patients and methods
A total of 60 patients, 20–60 years old, with American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification I and II, were enrolled in the study to be scheduled for awake nasal fiberoptic intubation for cervical spine surgery. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received fentanyl 1 μg/kg, intravenously+midazolam, intravenously, 0.05 mg/kg followed by saline infusion (placebo) with additional doses of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) to achieve a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to 2. Group 2 received fentanyl 1 μg/kg, intravenously+dexmedetomidine, intravenously, 1 μg/kg infusion over 10 min, and then the infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.1 μg/kg/h and titrated to 0.7 μg/kg/h to achieve Ramsay Sedation Scale greater than or equal to 2.
Measurements
Vital signs (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation) as well as respiratory rate were recorded. Arterial blood gases sampling was done before and after the intubation. The Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale was used to assess the level of sedation. The visual analog scale used to assess patients’ recall and discomfort, and finally, time to intubation in both groups was also recorded.
Results
There was significant decrease in heart rate, no difference in systolic blood pressure, and significant increases in SpO and PaO, with preservation of patient’s ventilation in dexmedetomidine group. No difference was noted in visual analog scale score or time to intubation between both the groups.
Conclusion
Dexmedetomidine provided better intubating conditions, better patient tolerance, higher patient satisfaction, and good hemodynamic responses compared with midazolam, with preservation of arousability in addition to better ventilation properties.

DOI

10.4103/ejca.ejca_2_17

Keywords

Awake fiberoptic intubation, Dexmedetomidine, midazolam, Sedation

Authors

First Name

Naser

Last Name

Fadel

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Safinaz Hassan

Last Name

Osman

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Mahmoud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Osman

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

11

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

48373

Issue Date

2017-01-01

Receive Date

2017-01-11

Publish Date

2017-01-01

Print ISSN

1687-9090

Online ISSN

2090-326X

Link

https://ejca.journals.ekb.eg/article_359657.html

Detail API

https://ejca.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=359657

Order

359,657

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia

Publication Link

https://ejca.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Use of dexemedetomidine–fentanyl versus midazolam–fentanyl for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation: a randomized double-blind controlled study

Details

Type

Article

Created At

20 Dec 2024