Beta
ManageSearchChatDiscover
351461

Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Article

Last updated: 20 Dec 2024

OverviewSimilar Items

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

We aimed to compare the clinical outcome of early 
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using 
blood cardioplegia versus Custodial solution for 
myocardial protection in patients with recent ST 
elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 

DOI

10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461

Volume

6

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

47292

Issue Date

2022-06-01

Receive Date

2024-04-23

Publish Date

2022-06-01

Print ISSN

2636-4204

Online ISSN

2636-4212

Article File

CVREPJ3514611654034400.pdf

PDF . 51.5kB

Link

https://cvrepj.journals.ekb.eg/article_351461.html

Detail API

https://cvrepj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=351461

Order

351,461

Type

Abstracts

Type Code

3,139

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Cardiovascular Research Prove Journal

Publication Link

https://cvrepj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Details

Type

Article

Created At

20 Dec 2024