Beta
329552

Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair rega

Article

Last updated: 29 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background
Wound infiltration with local anesthetics was developed to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption and its side effects.
Methods
This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded study. A total of 45 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, aged from 18 to 60 years scheduled for open abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to one of the following groups to receive wound infiltration 2 min prior to skin incision: group I: bupivacaine 0.25% alone (20 ml) ( = 15), group II: bupivacaine 0.25% + magnesium sulfate (1 g) (20 ml) ( = 15), and group III: bupivacaine 0.25% + dexmedetomidine (70 μg) (20 ml) ( = 15). Induction and maintenance were done according to our hospital protocol. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline and every 15 min till the end of surgery, the need for supplemental fentanyl, and the concentration of inhalational anesthetic were assessed. Postoperatively, Ramsay sedation scale was assessed 10 min post extubation and every 30 min for 6 h; visual analog scale was assessed at rest and every 30 min for 6 h postoperatively; time to the first request of analgesia and the cumulative analgesic consumption were recorded; HR and SBP were recorded for 6 h.
Results
The concentration of inhalational isoflurane and the need for supplemental fentanyl intraoperatively were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II. Postoperatively in group III, HR and SBP and visual analog scale scores were significantly lower compared with groups I and II. Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in group III up to 2 h after recovery in comparison to groups I and II. Group III showed longer time for the first request of analgesia and a lower need for postoperative opioids in comparison to groups I and II.
Conclusions
Wound infiltration with dexmedetomidine–bupivacaine mixture before skin incision decreases the anesthetic requirements, provides prolonged analgesia, and decreases the need for rescue analgesics in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.

DOI

10.1186/s42077-018-0012-8

Keywords

Analgesia, Dexmedetomidine, Open abdominal surgeries, wound infiltration

Authors

First Name

Hala Ezzat

Last Name

Abdelnaim

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Nashwa Nabil

Last Name

Mohamed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Amany Hassan

Last Name

Saleh

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

dr_amanyhassan@hotmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Ahmed Nabih

Last Name

Youssef

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

10

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

44733

Issue Date

2018-10-01

Receive Date

2018-10-01

Publish Date

2018-11-23

Print ISSN

1687-7934

Online ISSN

2090-925X

Link

https://asja.journals.ekb.eg/article_329552.html

Detail API

https://asja.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=329552

Order

329,552

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology

Publication Link

https://asja.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects

Details

Type

Article

Created At

20 Dec 2024