This study aims to reveal the monotheism evidence in the Quranic verses, which has rejected the presence of another god with Allah, ( this evidence was known as an oppositeness evidence and it was called Altamanu in the old islamic theology and it included the concept of impossibility ) which was presented by the theologians in the early Islamic times,as the current study aims to find out the truth of this evidence, and on another side this study tries to answer this question: Are the Quranic verses provided us with proof of certainty or they provided us only a rhetorical evidence for persuasion using a mode of reasoning by which the mind of the listener is convinced by a statement even it lacks the required demonstration of proof , which opens the door to say the existence of fallacies in the argument of Quranic structure.
This study discusses the arguments presented by the theologians of old theology when they drafted the impossibility evidence and the ability of these arguments to prove monotheism, so this study aims to reveal the relationship between verbal arguments and the truth of the Quranic verses
On the other hand, this study reveals the fallacies reasoning in theology as well as fallacies of the latecomers philosophers and the latecomers followers of Ahmad ibn Hanbal when they discussed the oppositeness evidence(Altamanu).