Beta
201404

المغالطات الحجاجية وخرق مبادئ التحاور في مناظرة العصربين أحمد ديدات وأنيس شروش Sporadic fallacies and breach of the principles of dialogue In the debate of the era between Ahmed

Article

Last updated: 05 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

The debate between Ahmed Deedat and Dr. Anis Shroush is one of the most famous debates of the age, which consists of the total of the interventions of the two parties and the exchange of words between them, which follow a serial requirement of pilgrims, which is based on the duality of the prosecution and the objection, making one party use the fallacy when he finds himself unable to respond The arguments of his opponent, and this has resulted in a clear violation of many of the principles of communication and etiquette of dialogue, and make the debate closed before reaching a harmony between pilgrims

DOI

10.21608/siaqat.2017.201404

Keywords

الحجاج، المغالطة، التحاور، المناظرة pilgrims, fallacy, Dialogue, debate

Authors

First Name

ربيعة

Last Name

برباق

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

أستاذ محاضر _أ_، كلية الآداب واللغات، جامعة العربي التبسي، تبسة، الجزائر

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

2

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

28410

Issue Date

2017-04-01

Receive Date

2021-10-26

Publish Date

2017-04-01

Page Start

25

Page End

48

Print ISSN

2537-060X

Online ISSN

2537-0553

Link

https://siaqat.journals.ekb.eg/article_201404.html

Detail API

https://siaqat.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=201404

Order

201,404

Type

المقالة الأصلية

Type Code

2,020

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

سياقات اللغة والدراسات البينية

Publication Link

https://siaqat.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

المغالطات الحجاجية وخرق مبادئ التحاور في مناظرة العصربين أحمد ديدات وأنيس شروش Sporadic fallacies and breach of the principles of dialogue In the debate of the era between Ahmed

Details

Type

Article

Created At

23 Jan 2023