In this paper, we will begin our conversation about the contemporary Arab discourse from
the angle from which it started its Renaissance concerns. This is the angle of criticism or critical
thinking, so that these experiments began to read the heritage either through faith in
communication or separation, Or the Islamic civilization of backwardness and stagnation, it
criticized everyone who saw it concerned or the cause of this recession, including heritage, the
mechanism that was claimed to be inspired by the Mu'tazilah or Western studies, but any critical
thought that he could not even stand before the political authority, from During the stripping of
all that is hidden, and even behold Z accountability heritage and is accountability, which was
mostly decent and predominantly ideological? Even if there is effective and vital criticism has
been from the outside, which is outside the battlefield, considering that the homes are homes of
ignorance and algebra and restriction of all kinds, but is this justification enough for the
educated to diagnose the situation of the high tower or the fortresses of the fortress of the
colonizer? In this paper, we will begin to identify the points in which this discourse failed,
namely to call for renewal by relying on the rereading of the religious discourse in the
foreground; which it considers to be primarily responsible for the decline of the Muslim
Ummah; and the neglect of many cultural patterns