This study works to deconstruct discourse as a component of the cognitive activity. It is the discourse in which we assumed that it is the projection of an interactive relationship between meaning and interpretation, not about behavioral imperatives based solely on abstract, lifeless levels. His analysis as an activity of knowledge built on the meaning and interpretation made him a living object interacting and die inaccurate understanding of the contents. We are also trying to argue that this cognitive perception is about the analysis of discourse from a simple machine of composition, meaning, sound, or lexicon ... to a cognitive activity that goes beyond the familiar and penetrates the agreed human knowledge, and thus it is certain that interaction with discourse requires Process-driven mental processes linked to a series of interlocking and interlocking levels that are central to the disclosure of the meaning of the letter and its message.