Subjects
-Tags
-Abstract
Background: Surgery is the only treatment for symptomatic saccrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Various surgical techniques are described in literature; yet, the ideal technique is still controversial because of the high recurrence rate that is associated with the majority of the techniques.
Aimof the work: To evaluate Limberg flap closure for the treatment of primary pilonidal sinus by comparing its
operative and postoperative outcome with open excision and healing by secondary intention.
Methods: This is a prospective randomized trial which enrolled eighty patients with primary pilonidal sinus from May
2015 to April 2018. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A included forty patients who underwent excision and the wound was left to heal by secondary intention. Group B included forty patients who underwent rhomboid excision and Limberg flap repair.
Results: The operative time was significantly longer in group B. Duration for complete wound healing and return to work were significantly longer in group A. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups neither in recurrence nor in postoperative complications.
Conclusion: Although recurrence was the same with in healing by secondary intention and Limberg flap, yet rhomboid excision and Limberg flap closure for the management of primary pilonidal sinus is better option in terms of wound healing and early return to work.
DOI
10.21608/asjs.2018.178220
Keywords
Pilonidal Sinus, Excision, secondary intention, flap closure
Authors
MiddleName
-Affiliation
Department of General Surgery, Ain Shams University, Egypt
Email
-City
-Orcid
-MiddleName
-Affiliation
Department of General Surgery, Ain Shams University, Egypt
Email
-City
-Orcid
-Link
https://asjs.journals.ekb.eg/article_178220.html
Detail API
https://asjs.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=178220
Publication Title
Ain Shams Journal of Surgery
Publication Link
https://asjs.journals.ekb.eg/
MainTitle
-