Background &  objectives:  Laparoscopic  colectomy  had  become  a  popular  choice   for treatment of cancer colon, as it is feasible, safe and provides many advantages to the patients in comparison to open colectomy  However, the adoption of the technique as the routine treatment for patients with cancer colon is still a subject of clinical trials. Methods: 60 patients with cancer colon were randomly dividedinto 2 equal groups.  Group A patients underwent open surgery, and group B patients had laparoscopic surgery.The results of both groups were compared and statistically analyzed to identify the advantage and limitations of the laparoscopic approach. Results:   Laparoscopic  colectomy  was associated  with longer  operative times  than  open colectomy  The outcomes of patients of the laparoscopic group  was comparable  {oncological results & recovery of bowel functions) or better (postoperative pain, wound complications and hospital stay) than the open group. Conclusions:  Laparoscopic  resection   for cancer  colon is safe,  feasible and  has  better recovery and comparable  oncological results than open colectomy  More analysis is needed before implementation of the technique in routine practice and training.