Review: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is one of the most widely spread diseases allover the world. The principle underlying its surgical management is the creation of a mechanical antireflux barrier between the esophagus and the stomach through the creation of either a total (360 degree), or partial anterior or posterior fundal wraps around the lower esophageal end. The ability of surgery to mechanically control the reflux has been documented. The pathogenesis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease is essentially a motility-related problem with varying contributory elements. The role of different techniques in correcting the underlying motility disorder has been little studied in the randomised literature. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the laparoscopic partial posterior and the laparoscopic total fundoplication techniques in objectively controlling the reflux and correcting the underlying esophageal motility disorder in gastro-esophageal reflux patients on the mid-term. Patients and methods: In the period between June 1998 and July 2007, 40 patients considered for antireflux surgery in the department of surgery, Tanta University Hospital, were prospectively recruited and randomised to undergo either laparoscopic total (Nissen) or laparoscopic partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication. In addition to the clinical follow-up, objective follow up through esophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed 24 months after operation and compared to the same data recorded preoperatively. Results: Both the total and the partial posterior fundoplication techniques showed excellent control of heartburn and regurgitation postoperatively. This correlated well with the postoperative endoscopic findings, where both techniques were equally effective in correcting hiatus hernias and healing reflux esophagitis. In the Nissen group, the lower esophageal resting pressure significantly increased postoperatively from a median of 23, to 33 mmHg (p < 0.01) and the nadir pressure from a median of 0 to 9 mmHg (p < 0.01). Similar significant improvements were observed in the Toupet group as well (24 to 31mmHg, 2 to 8 mmHg respectively, p < 0.01), no significant difference was found in-between the studied groups (P>0.05). Length of the abdominal component was significantly increased postoperatively from a median of 3 to 4 cm and from a median of 2 to 4 cm in the Nissen and Toupet groups respectively (p < 0.01), with no significant difference in-between the studied  groups (P>0.05).  No significant changes were found in the esophageal body contraction amplitude on comparing the pre and postoperative values in both groups (p>0.05).  The median total acid exposure time in the Nissen and Toupet groups was significantly reduced from a preoperative 13% to 1% and from 17 % to 0% respectively, with similar reduction in the number of pH proven reflux episodes from a median of 24 to 2 and from 30 to 2 respectively (p < 0.01). The small number of cases with Barrett's metaplasia in our study made it difficult to draw hard conclusions on the difference between the two surgical techniques in this particular type of patients. Conclusion: The partial posterior and total fundoplication techniques are equally effective in restoring the lower esophageal pressure profile and in objectively controlling the reflux on the mid-term. No changes in the esophageal body contraction amplitude could be found with either technique. No objective advantages could be demonstrated for either technique to support a tailored approach.