Beta
163038

MACULAR OCT FINDINGS AFTER SUCCESSFUL RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR; A COMPARISON BETWEEN CASES WITH AND WITHOUT VISUAL IMPROVEMENT

Article

Last updated: 23 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Purpose: A comparative study using OCT to determine the possible causes associated with
incomplete visual recovery after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in
cases with and without visual improvement.
Patients& methods: We studied 200 eyes of 200
patients with RRD that involved the fovea. The patients were examined and the findings
recorded before and after surgery. The period from the onset of symptoms to presentation
ranged from 3-60 days. OCT was performed at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th post-operative months. The
patients were followed for a period from 6-18 months (mean 8.4 months).
Results: On comparing
the best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) at 1st and 6th months, there was a mean gain of 3
Snellen lines (range; 1-6 lines) in 160 patients (80%) and no improvement in 40 patients
(20%).The mean postoperative BCVA at 1,3 and 6 months of the improved patients was 6/60,
6/24,and 6/18 respectively (Log MAR equivalent of 1.00, 0.60 ,and 0.50 ). OCT of these 40 eyes
without visual improvement showed subfoveal fluid in 10 eyes (25%), macular edema(ME) in 21
(52.5%) eyes, epiretinal membranes(ERM) in 15 eyes (37.5%), photoreceptor damage (distortion of
the photoreceptors IS/OS junction in 31 eyes (77.5%), macular holes(MH) in 2 eyes (5%), and
retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) degenerative changes in 11 eyes (27.5%). OCT of those with
visual improvement also showed some abnormalities which contributed to incomplete visual
recovery: ME in 21 eyes (13.2%), ERM in 9 (5.6%)eyes, subfoveal fluid in 40 eyes (25%),
photoreceptor damage in 31 eyes (19.4%), and RPE degenerative changes in 12 eyes (7.5%).
Conclusion: Incomplete and/or delayed visual recovery after successful retinal reattachment may
occur even in cases with visual improvement due to many causes; photoreceptor damage, macular
edema, epiretinal membranes, subfoveal fluid, macular holes, and RPE degenerative changes.
OCT is a valuable and noninvasive tool for detecting, evaluating and follow-up of these cases.


DOI

10.21608/ejco.2018.163038

Keywords

Macular OCT, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Epiretinal membranes

Authors

First Name

Elagouz,

Last Name

M.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Ophthalmology dept., Faculty of Medicine, Sohag Univ., Sohag, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Farouk,

Last Name

M.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Ophthalmology dept., Faculty of Medicine, Sohag Univ., Sohag, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mostafa,

Last Name

E.

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Ophthalmology dept., Faculty of Medicine, Sohag Univ., Sohag, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

1

Article Issue

2

Related Issue

23737

Issue Date

2018-12-01

Receive Date

2018-06-06

Publish Date

2018-12-01

Page Start

49

Page End

54

Print ISSN

2537-0502

Online ISSN

2537-0944

Link

https://ejco.journals.ekb.eg/article_163038.html

Detail API

https://ejco.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=163038

Order

2

Type

Case reports: all new cases, rare cases, interesting cases can be reported.

Type Code

1,826

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology

Publication Link

https://ejco.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

23 Jan 2023