Beta
78927

Comparing different porcelain surface polishing techniques after orthodontic brackets debonding

Article

Last updated: 25 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Objectives: The present study was designed to investigate different polishing techniques used to restore feldspathic porcelain surface regarding surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets. Methods: Metal discs of 1 cm diameter and 1 mm thickness (n=85) were prepared from Wiron 99 non-precious alloy (BEGO Bremer Goldschägerei with Herbst GmbH& Co. Bremen. Germany). The discs were veneered from one side by 1 mm thickness Vita VMK Master feldspathic porcelain (Vita zhan fabric H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG. Germany). Five of these intact samples composed the control group (C). Orthodontic metal brackets were bonded at the center of each of the remaining discs (3M, Unitek),
and then discs were water stored for 30 days before rebounding. Brackets were debonded using bracket removing pliers, and resin was removed with a sharp chisel. The prepared specimens (n=80) were divided into 4 groups (n=20) according to the surface treatment they were to receive: (G1): using (Shofu, USA) porcelain veneer jkit, (G2): using (Ultradent, USA) porcelain finishing kit, (G3): using (Sof-lex 3M, USA) porcelain polishing kit, and (G4): no surface treatment. The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated quantitatively using USB Digital microscope with a built-in camera (Scope Capture Digital Microscope, Guangdong, China). WSxM software was used to calculate root mean square (RMS) of the average height of every specimen expressed in (μm) in each group including control samples. Data was analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by student's t test (p<0.05). Results: The polishing techniques affected surface roughness significantly (P<0.001), with significant higher Ra values than the glazed baseline porcelain. The surface roughness values were not statistically different among the polishing groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that the tested polishing techniques improved the surface roughness greatly, however, were not able to reestablish the original glazed porcelain smoothness.

DOI

10.21608/eos.2011.78927

Authors

First Name

Hany

Last Name

Eid

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr University for Science and Technology, 6th of October city, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Nasser

Last Name

Hussein

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr University for Science and Technology, 6th of October city, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

40

Article Issue

December 2011

Related Issue

11773

Issue Date

2011-12-01

Receive Date

2011-07-24

Publish Date

2011-12-01

Page Start

77

Page End

90

Print ISSN

1110-435X

Online ISSN

2812-5258

Link

https://eos.journals.ekb.eg/article_78927.html

Detail API

https://eos.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=78927

Order

5

Type

Original Article

Type Code

1,120

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

Publication Link

https://eos.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Comparing different porcelain surface polishing techniques after orthodontic brackets debonding

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023