This paper evaluates the seismic behavior of four methods for retrofitting typical reinforced concrete school building. The original school (SO) suffers from limited ductility and lateral resistance. The four seismic upgrading methods are using carbon fiber reinforced polymers (SUFRP), steel jacket (SUSJ), bracing (SUBR), or concrete jacket (SUCJ). Nonlinear pushover and time history analyses are made for the five schools. Three code-scaled natural earthquakes are utilized for the inelastic response history analysis. The pushover analysis revealed that providing the school with bracing (SUBR) results in reducing the lateral displacements. However, the three other types of seismic retrofit (SUFRP, SUSJ, and SUCJ) develop larger lateral displacements when compared to the original school (SO). The translation ductility and energy dissipation for school SUBR is poor while they are good for schools SUFRP, SUSJ, and SUCJ. The base shear is increased for the four upgrading methods (SUFRP, SUSJ, SUBR, and SUCJ) compared to school SO. From the nonlinear time-history analysis, the maximum interstorey drift was approximately similar for schools SO, SUFRP, and SUCJ. Lesser values for the maximum interstorey drift are obtained for schools SUSJ and SUBR. The nonlinear time-history analysis also gives similar base shear for all the upgrading methods compared to school SO with the exception of school SUCJ which showed increase in the base shear.