Beta
185218

EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR MAXILLARY HORIZONTAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION WITH SIMULTANOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING CERABONE® VERSUS CERABONE® COMBINED WITH PLATELET RICH PLASMA (RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL)

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla using dental implants is frequently problematic because of the deficiency of alveolar ridge width. Under certain conditions ridge augmentation with simultaneous implant placement is recommended.
Objectives:To evaluate horizontal augmentation of narrow anterior maxillary alveolar ridge with simultaneous implant placement using Cerabone® with and without platelet rich plasma (PRP).
Materials and Methods:In this study, 14 implants were placed in patients with insufficient alveolar ridge width in the maxillary lateral incisor region. Patients were divided into two groups; In Group “1" Cerabone® only was used as an augmentation material while in Group “2" a mixture of Cerabone® and PRP was used. A collagen membrane was used to cover the grafting material. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale. Healing and postoperative edema were evaluated. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was obtained before surgery, immediately postoperatively and after 6 months so that the labial bone width and bone density were evaluated. Osstell was used to evaluate implant stability quotient (ISQ) during surgery and after 6 months.
Results:All implants in both groups were successfully osseointegrated and functionally stable. No significant difference in postoperative pain, edema or wound healing was detected between the two groups. The mean percentage of change in ISQ was superior in Group “2" when compared to Group “1", but statistically there was no significant difference (P=0.898). The labial bone width in Group “2" was significantly higher than that of Group “1" (P=0.002). The mean percentage of change in labial bone density was 57.95% in Group “1" and 112.52% in Group “2" (P=0.848).
Conclusion:Cerabone® can be used effectively for guided bone regeneration around dental implant in narrow maxillary anterior alveolar ridges. Moreover, the addition of PRP has a positive effect on bone regeneration around implants.

DOI

10.21608/adjalexu.2021.185218

Keywords

ridge augmentation, Xenograft, Cerabone, PRP

Authors

First Name

Ahmed

Last Name

Ibrahim

MiddleName

M.

Affiliation

BDS,2008, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Email

doctor_ai_2@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mervat

Last Name

Khalil

MiddleName

M.

Affiliation

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Gaafar

Last Name

El Halawani

MiddleName

N.

Affiliation

Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Email

gaafrouni@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

46

Article Issue

Issue 2

Related Issue

26744

Issue Date

2021-08-01

Receive Date

2021-07-24

Publish Date

2021-08-01

Page Start

1

Page End

7

Print ISSN

1110-015X

Online ISSN

2536-9156

Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_185218.html

Detail API

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=185218

Order

1

Type

Original Article

Type Code

1,057

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Alexandria Dental Journal

Publication Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023