Beta
57859

MUCOSAL FLAP VERSUS MUCOPERIOSTEAL FLAP IN RIDGE SPLITTING AND SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING PIEZOSURGERY (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

Oral and maxillofacial surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ridge split procedures are commonly performed for horizontal widening-augmentation of narrow ridges which would otherwise preclude implant placement. Post-surgical vertical and horizontal crestal bone loss that might occur secondary to ridge splitting techniques present a serious obstacle to the success of implant placement and prognosis. OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of the effectiveness of maintaining the periosteal attachment of the buccal and lingual cortical plates to reduce and/or prevent crestal bone loss that might occur at the crestal margin of dental implants placed immediately in posterior mandibular alveolar ridges splitted using piezosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: That was a randomized controlled clinical trial. The study population included 16 patients with edentulous posterior mandibular alveolar ridges. The sample was selected conveniently to fulfill a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then the selected participants were allocated randomly into two equal groups each including 8 patients. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap were performed in the control group patients, while a split thickness mucosal flap was done in the study group patients. All patients had undergone a mandibular ridge splitting technique using piezoelectrical surgical device. After ridge-splitting-porcedure implants with interpositional grafts were placed immediately. Assessments included measurements of the linear changes in the marginal bone surrounding the implants immediately postoperative as baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months postoperative. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of measurements obtained from both groups showed no significant difference between control and study groups regarding pain and edema assessment, while probing depth, and marginal bone level showed significant difference between both groups in favor to the study group. CONCLUSIONS: The ridge splitting technique using a partial thickness flap could be a successful option for the reduction of marginal bone loss around immediately inserted implants

DOI

10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57859

Keywords

ridge splitting, piezosurgery, split thickness flap, Full thickness flap, horizontal distraction, posterior edentulous mandible

Authors

First Name

Ziad T.

Last Name

Mahmoud

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mostafa M.

Last Name

El-Dibany

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Sherif M.

Last Name

El-Ghamrawy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Saeeda M.

Last Name

Osman

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Angelo C.

Last Name

Troedhan

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Visiting Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University & University of Health Science Vientiane

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

42

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

8732

Issue Date

2017-04-01

Receive Date

2019-11-09

Publish Date

2017-04-01

Page Start

67

Page End

72

Print ISSN

1110-015X

Online ISSN

2536-9156

Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_57859.html

Detail API

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=57859

Order

11

Type

Original Article

Type Code

1,057

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Alexandria Dental Journal

Publication Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023