Beta
58039

EVALUATION OF PANORAMIC X-RAY VERSUS CONE BEAM COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN SURGICAL REMOVAL OF HORIZONTALLY IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Computerized scanning technology has been in use for 30 years. Originally, it was called Computerized Axial Tomography or CAT. Today, with advances in miniaturization and computer software and a revolution in imaging, CAT scan technology has been moved from the hospital to the private dental office in the form of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT), which will be an alternative radiographic study over the standard panoramic images. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the advantage of CBCT over panoramic X-ray in surgical removal of horizontally impacted mandibular third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on twenty patients selected from the Out-patient Clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, diagnosed by horizontally impacted mandibular third molar class II position B. All patients were diagnosed clinically and radiographically. Patients were divided randomly in two groups, 10 patients were diagnosed preoperatively by CBCT film (study group) and the other 10 patients were diagnosed by panoramic radiographic film (control group). Intraoperative and postoperative evaluation was carried out to monitor postoperative pain, inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia, trismus and postoperative edema at 3rd, 7th and 15th day. RESULTS: Patients in the study group experienced statistically significant less pain and less postoperative edema than those in the control group (p=0.05, and p=0.048 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the trismus and no patients in both groups suffered of alveolar nerve paresthesia. Less postoperative pain was diagnosed in the study group than in the control group. No inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia was found in the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the trismus. Less postoperative edema was found in the study group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT showed higher specificity to the inferior alveolar nerve localization as compared to panoramic x-ray. Hence, it is recommended that CBCT imaging is to be considered included in the diagnostic work-up prior to surgical removal of deeply impacted third molars.

DOI

10.21608/adjalexu.2016.58039

Keywords

mandibular third molar impaction, horizontal impaction, Cone beam computed tomography

Authors

First Name

Ingy N.

Last Name

Badawy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Bachelor of Dentistry, BDS, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Nagy H.

Last Name

El Prince

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Adham A.

Last Name

El Ashwah

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University Alexandria, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

41

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

8731

Issue Date

2016-12-01

Receive Date

2019-11-10

Publish Date

2016-12-01

Page Start

277

Page End

282

Print ISSN

1110-015X

Online ISSN

2536-9156

Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/article_58039.html

Detail API

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=58039

Order

8

Type

Original Article

Type Code

1,057

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Alexandria Dental Journal

Publication Link

https://adjalexu.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023