Beta
56650

DUPLEX GUIDED VERSUS CONTRAST VENOGRAPHY FOR LANDING OF INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTER (COMPARATIVE STUDY)

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Vena cava filters are an important alternative when anticoagulation is contraindicated. Techniques for placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have undergone continued evolution from open surgical exposure of the venous insertion site to percutaneous insertion in most cases .Today, all of the commonly used filters can be placed via a peripheral vein by using percutaneous puncture. Increased experience with color flow duplex scanning for routine IVC imaging and portability of ultrasound equipment have suggested the usefulness of duplex-guided IVC filter insertion (DGFI). Objective: Comparing bedside trans-abdominal duplex ultrasound versus contrast venography for inferior vena cava filter placement as regard to safety, efficacy , results and possible complications. Patients and Methods: This was a comparative study which included 30 patients divided into two groups: Group A which contained 15 patients by which filter placement was done by contrast venography in Al-Hussein Hospital, and Group B which contained 15 patients by which filter placement was done by duplex ultrasound in Al- Zahraa Hospital. History, complete examination and investigations were done to all the patients. Results:  There was a difference between both groups according to the age, gender, pulmonary embolism attack , indications for IVC filter deployment and the venous access aproach but insignificant, All filters were permenant and most common indication was recurrent tromboembolism insbite of adequate anticoagulation. Two patients in Group A suffered from hematoma and echymosis at access site, and filter deployment failed for the first time in two patients of Group B, but succeeded for the second time with no mortality detected. Conclusion: Inferior vena cava filter insertion was safe and effective in preventing pulmonary embolism. Fluroscopy has traditionally been the golden standard procedure for IVC filter deployment. Duplex guidance can replace fluoroscopy to guide the procedure in patients whose conditions can not tolerate the contrast material or exposure to X-ray.  The current study suggested that duplex guided filter insertion was safe, reliable, and accurate as the fluoroscopy guided procedure. Duplex guided method has proved to be cost effective as it can be done as a bedside procedure.  Obesity constituted the major technical limitation of duplex guided procedure.

DOI

10.12816/0038272

Keywords

Duplex, Venography, Inferior vena cava

Authors

First Name

Omar

Last Name

El-Mokhtar Ibrahim

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Abdelhamied Goma

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Sherif

Last Name

Alaa Sharaby

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

46

Article Issue

2

Related Issue

8497

Issue Date

2017-04-01

Receive Date

2017-04-01

Publish Date

2017-04-01

Page Start

495

Page End

506

Print ISSN

1110-0400

Link

https://amj.journals.ekb.eg/article_56650.html

Detail API

https://amj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=56650

Order

20

Type

Original Article

Type Code

941

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Al-Azhar Medical Journal

Publication Link

https://amj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023