Field experiments were conducted in 2014 and 2015 at Sakha Agriculture Research station, Kafr El-Sheikh (31° 07' N Latitude, 30° 57' E Longitude) at North Nile Delta, Egypt to study the effects of raised beds, irrigation intervals and ammonia gas injection levels on productivity of irrigation water (PIW) of rice. A split split plot design with four replications was used. Ammonia gas injection levels were devoted to the main plot, irrigation treatments were allocated in sub-plots and rice planting methods were arranged in sub sub-plots. Ammonia gas injection levels were 70 unit nitrogen N (F₁), 80 units (F₂) and 90 units (F₃). Planting methods treatments were transplanting in flat, as a traditional method (M₁), and transplanting in raised beds only (M₂). Irrigation intervals were irrigation every four days after transplanting (I₁), irrigation every six days after transplanting (I₂), and irrigation every eight days after transplanting (I₃).  Results showed that there was no significant difference on GY between I₁ and I₂ while there were a significant difference on SY, BiomY and other yield components between I₁, I₂ and I₃. The highest values of SY, BiomY and other yield components were obtained from I₂ compared to I₁ and I₃. As for planting treatments, GY, SY and BiomY increased by 20.8%, 40.4% and 31.7% respectively under M₂ compared with M₁. There were no significant differences on GY and its attributes between F₂ and F₃ except SY and BiomY.  Mean values of water applied for M₁ received the highest amount of IWA to be 14338 m³ ha^-1 compared to M₂ which was 10443 m³ ha^-1, respectively. The amount of water used in M₂ is a feasible amount to grow rice with a 27.2% saving of water. Higher value of PIW of I₂ proved its superiority over I₁ and I₃ treatments by 16% and 7%, respectively. Planting methods treatment M₂ increased NUE by 21% compared to M₁. The highest values of NUE were recorded for I₁ and I₂ without any significant differences between them whereas the lowest one was obtained from I₃. Also, the highest mean value of NUE was obtained under F₁whereas the lowest was under F₃. Therefore, M₂ could be applied by the farmers' under irrigation interval of I₂ and 80 units  N as ammonia gas injection (F₂)  because it saved irrigation water by 36% and increased NUE by 17% compared to M₁  x I₁ x  F₁ which in normally practiced in North Delta, Egypt, without any reductions in GY.