A field trial was conducted during the two consecutive growing seasons of 2016/17 and 2017/18 at Sakha Agricultural Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate. The aim of this current study was to evaluate the effect of four irrigations treatments; cut-off at 100 (I₁, traditional practice), 90%(I₂), 80% (I₃) and 70% (I₄) from furrow length and five fertilization treatments; F1 (90 Kg N Fed.^-1), F2 (67.5 kg N+3 ton compost fed.^-1), F3 (45 kg N+5 ton compost fed.^-1), F4 (22.5 Kg N+7 ton compost fed^-1) and F5 (10 ton compost fed.^-1) (ha =2.4 fed) on some water parameters, some soil properties and yield of sugar beet. The experiments were designed as spilt plot with three replications. The main plots were occupied by cut-off irrigation, while subplots were devoted to fertilization rates. The main results can be summarized as follows: The highest values of applied water (3678 and 3562 m³ fed^-1); water consumptive use (2381 and 2210 m³ fed^-1) and water stored (2525 and 2456 m³ fed^-1) were recorded under I₁ (local farmers practice) in the 1^st and 2^nd seasons, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest values of applied water (3168 and 3094 m³ fed.^-1); water consumptive use (2218 and 2062 m³ fed^-1) and water stored (2325 and 2335 m³ fed^-1) were recorded with I₄ in the 1^st and 2^nd seasons, respectively. The highest values of water saving was recorded under I₄ as average of the two growing seasons (12.14 cm and 11.14 cm, respectively) which saved about 100*10⁶ m³ water in sugar beet fields at the national level (200*10³ fed) comparing with check treatment (I₁). The highest values of irrigation application and consumptive use efficiencies in both seasons were achieved under irrigation treatment I₄ but the lowest values were recorded under irrigation treatment I₁ in the two studied seasons. Concerning to water productivity ( ) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW), the highest values of  (14.09 and 16.74 Kg m^-3) and PIW (9.70 and 11.61 kgm^-3) were recorded under I₃ in the first and second seasons, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest values of  (12.16 and 14.99 kgm^-3) and IPW (7.88 and 9.30 Kgm^-3) were recorded with I₁ in both seasons, respectively. Concerning to the role of fertilization in  and PIW, F₂ treatment achieved the highest values of  (14.38  and 17.38 kg m^-3) and PIW (9.99 and 11.23 kg m^-3), while F4 treatment gave the lowest values of both parameters in both seasons, respectively The soil ECe, SAR and ESP as mean values of both seasons were affected by irrigation cut-off and fertilization treatments. The highest reduction of ECe, SAR and ESP was induced by F₅ under I₁, while the lowest reduction was recorded with F₁ and I₄. The highest root yields (18.78 and 20.61 ton fed^-1) were achieved with I₃, while F5 was the best fertilization treatment (15.76 and 18.13 ton root fed.^-1) in both seasons, respectively. So, the highest significant effects of cut- off and fertilization treatments on sugar beet root, shoot and sugar yields in both growing seasons were achieved with I₃ and F₅. Also, there were high significant effects on such parameters due to the interactions between different treatments.