Beta
49806

RESPONSE OF SIDDEK AND KIETT MANGO TREES TO GIBBERELLIC ACID AND UREA FOLIAR SPRAYING AT FLOWER BUD INDUCTION PERIOD A. FLORAL ASPECTS

Article

Last updated: 04 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

During 2014/ 2015 and 2015/ 2016 seasons, a field experiment was conducted on 45 trees of each of Siddek and Kiett mango cvs. The trees were 8-year-old, grafted on Succari rootstock, similar in growth vigour as possible and grown at 4 × 3 m in sandy soil under drip irrigation system in a private mango orchard at Belbies District, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. The experimental trees were foliar sprayed with GA3 at 0, 50 or 100 ppm and urea at 1.5% either alone or in combination with GA3 at 100 ppm. The trees were sprayed at 3 dates at fortnightly intervals (1st Dec., mid Dec. and 1st Jan.). The obtained results showed that sex ratio, fruit set and flower drop percentages were higher on Siddek trees than those of Kiett ones. The trees were sprayed at mid Dec. induced the highest sex ratio and fruit set percentages. The trees were sprayed at early Dec. showed the highest flower drop percentage than those sprayed at the other two dates. Fruit retention percentage was significantly affected by either variety or spraying date in both seasons. Mango trees sprayed with GA3 at 100 ppm or urea at 1.5% either alone or combined exhibited the highest values of sex ratio, fruit set and fruit retention percentages in most cases. Whereas, unsprayed trees (control) and those sprayed with GA3 at 50 ppm induced the highest flower drop percentage. It is quite evident from the previous trends that spraying Siddek and Kiett mango trees with GA3 at 100 ppm or urea at 1.5% either alone or in combination at early or mid Dec., was more effective in increasing fruit set and fruit retention percentages than unsprayed trees (control) which gained the least percentages in most cases and the highest flower drop percentage. Accordingly and from the economic view, we can suggest to spray Siddek and Kiett mango trees with urea at 1.5% at early or mid Dec. for increasing fruit set and fruit retention percentages and consequently increasing fruit yield/tree.

DOI

10.21608/zjar.2018.49806

Keywords

Mangifera indica, siddek, kitte, GA3, urea, Spraying Date, bud induction, infloresence

Authors

First Name

Osama

Last Name

Nouh

MiddleName

K.M.

Affiliation

Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt

Email

faridmsamy@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

T.

Last Name

Abou Sayed-Ahmed

MiddleName

A.M.

Affiliation

Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

A.

Last Name

Hassan

MiddleName

S.A.

Affiliation

Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

F.

Last Name

Mohsen

MiddleName

S.

Affiliation

Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

45

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

7704

Issue Date

2018-01-01

Receive Date

2017-11-09

Publish Date

2018-01-01

Page Start

75

Page End

86

Print ISSN

1110-0338

Online ISSN

3009-7193

Link

https://zjar.journals.ekb.eg/article_49806.html

Detail API

https://zjar.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=49806

Order

5

Type

Original Article

Type Code

842

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

Publication Link

https://zjar.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

RESPONSE OF SIDDEK AND KIETT MANGO TREES TO GIBBERELLIC ACID AND UREA FOLIAR SPRAYING AT FLOWER BUD INDUCTION PERIOD A. FLORAL ASPECTS

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023