Beta
257911

A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteroscopic Extraction of Upper Ureteric Calculus: A Prospective Study

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

Surgery

Abstract

Background: The daily practice of urology includes managing patients with urolithiasis, and there are various methods for managing ureteral calculi. There are many techniques for fragmenting stones. The holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Ho: YAG] laser is often utilized in stone disintegration procedures.
Aim of the work: This research compares the effectiveness of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in treating patients with upper ureteric calculi regarding the percentage of patients who remain stone-free, hospital stays, surgical times, and complications.
Patients and methods: Sixty individuals with upper ureteric calculus participated in this prospective comparative analysis. From February 2021 to March 2022, the patients were randomly divided into two groups [Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy]. The main goals of both treatments were to break the stone into pieces smaller than 3 mm, which was confirmed by an X-ray [KUB] on the first post-operative day.
Results: The study's eligibility criteria were met by 60 individuals with upper ureteric stones [30 in the pneumatic group and 30 in the laser group]. In laser lithotripsy, the immediately stone-free rate was 93.3 percent, while in pneumatic lithotripsy, it was 70.0 percent [p value 0.059]. Proximal migration was 6.7% in Laser Lithotripsy and 26.6% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy [p > 0.038]. Pneumatic lithotripsy had a substantially longer operating time than laser lithotripsy [27.83±6.11 min vs. 24.47±5.08 min; p=0.024]. There were no statistically substantial variations between the two groups regarding the patients' age, sex, stone size, length of hospitalization, and complications.
Conclusion: Laser and pneumatic lithotripsy are safe and effective in the treatment of upper ureteric stone with few minor complications; however, laser lithotripsy has a better stone free rate, less operative time, less fluid irrigated and less upward stone migration than pneumatic lithotripsy.

DOI

10.21608/ijma.2022.145395.1466

Keywords

Pneumatic lithotripsy, Laser Lithotripsy, Stone free rate, proximal migration

Authors

First Name

Mohammed

Last Name

Ahmed

MiddleName

H.

Affiliation

Department of Urology, Kobry El Koba Military Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Cairo, Egypt

Email

mohammedhg1992@gmail.com

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Amany

Last Name

Soliman

MiddleName

A.

Affiliation

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

damanyahmed@gmail.com

City

cairo

Orcid

-

First Name

Refaat

Last Name

Awad

MiddleName

M.

Affiliation

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Adel

Last Name

Hussein

MiddleName

S.

Affiliation

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine [for girls], Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

4

Article Issue

8

Related Issue

38113

Issue Date

2022-08-01

Receive Date

2022-06-18

Publish Date

2022-08-01

Page Start

2,550

Page End

2,557

Print ISSN

2636-4174

Online ISSN

2682-3780

Link

https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_257911.html

Detail API

https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=257911

Order

2

Type

Original Article

Type Code

816

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

International Journal of Medical Arts

Publication Link

https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023