Beta
31200

Pentacam topographic changes after Epithelium-off collagen cross-linking versus Epithelium-on collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus

Article

Last updated: 24 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Keratoconus is a bilateral non-inflammatory disease .One of its characteristics is reduction of biomechanical strength of cornea and stromal thinning , which gradually decreases corneal thickness and induces  irregular astigmatism , myopia , corneal scaring, andreduction of visual acuity.(1)For early stages of keratoconus , one would use spectacles and contact lenses though the progression of the disease can lead to irregular astigmatism or corneal scaring, leaving no other option but corneal transplantation in about 20% of patients.(2)Corneal transplantation is an expensive procedure with many complications such as high astigmatism and graft rejection;  hence, seeking for a way to halt this progressive disease seems to be of crucial importance.(3)
For more than a decade, corneal cross-linking  (CXL)   has been considered as the only method for improvingcorneal biomechanical power.(4)Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a low-invasive treatment aimed to improve biomechanical stability in eyes with keratectasia.(5)
The “standard CXL protocol" described by Wollensak and colleagues includes removal of the corneal epithelium in a diameter of 9 mm , followed by saturation of the corneal stroma using 0.1% isotonic riboflavin solution in 20% dextran.(6)This procedure is proved to be effective in increasing corneal stiffness , stabilization of keratoconus , and in some cases in improving the refractive and topographic features.Even so, the epithelial removal may lead to serious complications that include infection(7),stromal haze (8), and corneal melting (9)in addition to severe pain and decrease in vision occurring during the first days after the treatment.To avoid such complications, Boxer Wachler et al. suggested a modification of the technique by keeping the epithelium intact (epithelium-on or transepithelial CXL) (10).In this study, we sought to compare keratoconus indices before and after crosslinking either epi-off or epi-on CXL by Pentacam criteria.

DOI

10.21608/smj.2018.31200

Authors

First Name

Asmaa

Last Name

Elasmay

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.

Email

-

City

Sohag

Orcid

-

First Name

Gamal

Last Name

Radwan

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.

Email

gamal_radwan@med.sohag.edu.eg

City

Sohag

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed

Last Name

Elagouz

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.

Email

-

City

Sohag

Orcid

-

First Name

Hatem

Last Name

Ammar

MiddleName

Gamal

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.

Email

hatem_amar@med.sohag.edu.eg

City

Sohag

Orcid

-

Volume

22

Article Issue

3

Related Issue

4807

Issue Date

2018-10-01

Receive Date

2018-08-06

Publish Date

2018-10-01

Page Start

33

Page End

37

Print ISSN

1687-8353

Online ISSN

2682-4159

Link

https://smj.journals.ekb.eg/article_31200.html

Detail API

https://smj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=31200

Order

5

Type

Original Article

Type Code

785

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Sohag Medical Journal

Publication Link

https://smj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Pentacam topographic changes after Epithelium-off collagen cross-linking versus Epithelium-on collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023