Beta
102797

Endovascular versus Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Article

Last updated: 22 Jan 2023

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilation of the aorta due to aortic wall continues to weaken. If left untreated to withstand the forces of the luminal blood pressure resulting in progressive dilatation and rupture with a mortality of 50 – 80%. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR) against Open Surgical Repair (OSR), of infra-renal AAA regarding the type of anesthesia, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.
Patient and Methods: From January 2016 to December 2017 in Al-Azhar University Hospital and Military Hospitals in Cairo, we assigned 30 patients with AAA ≥5.5 cm in diameter to undergo either EVAR or OSR; in two equal groups. Patients were followed up for type of anesthesia, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and complications.
Results: Regarding comorbidities, 90% were smokers, 83.3% were diabetic, 76.7% had hypertension (HTN), and 66.7% had ischemic heart disease (IHD). Regarding intra-operative complications, the overall complications rate was 23.3%, with 3.3% had arrhythmias, 3.3% had distal emboli, and 16.7% had hemorrhages and received a blood transfusion. There was a non-significant difference as regards gender, marital status, smoking, and Diabetes Mellitus between the 2 groups. A comparative study between the 2 groups revealed a significant increase in age, HTN, and IHD in the EVAR group, compared to the OSR group, with a significant statistical difference.  A comparative study between the 2 groups revealed a significant decrease in AAA size and operative time in the EVAR group, compared to the OSR group, with a significant statistical difference. A comparative study between the 2 groups revealed a non-significant difference as regards intra-operative complications and blood transfusion. A comparative study between the 2 groups revealed a significant decrease in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and ward stay in the EVAR group; compared to the OSR group. Conclusion: EVAR compared to conventional surgery has some benefits, such as lower hospital stay, ICU stay, blood loss, rates of hospital mortality, rates of complications, and re-intervention.

 

DOI

10.21608/aimj.2020.25860.1170

Keywords

Hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, AAA, EVAR

Authors

First Name

Shehab

Last Name

Elsayed

MiddleName

Ahmed

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery department, Elshiekh Zaied Specialized Hospital

Email

shepo.sa@gmail.com

City

Cairo

Orcid

-

First Name

Abd Elaziz

Last Name

Abd Elhafez

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery department, Faculty of medicicn, Al-Azhar University

Email

aziz4200@hotmail.com

City

Cairo

Orcid

-

First Name

Omar

Last Name

Elmokhtar

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Vascular Surgery department,Faculty of medicen , Al-Azhar University

Email

omar_elmokhtar60@gmail.com

City

Cairo

Orcid

-

Volume

1

Article Issue

6

Related Issue

15868

Issue Date

2020-06-01

Receive Date

2020-03-14

Publish Date

2020-06-01

Page Start

212

Page End

216

Print ISSN

2682-3381

Online ISSN

2682-339X

Link

https://aimj.journals.ekb.eg/article_102797.html

Detail API

https://aimj.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=102797

Order

12

Type

Original Article

Type Code

710

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

Al-Azhar International Medical Journal

Publication Link

https://aimj.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

-

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023