Beta
262314

Individualized versus Conventional Positive End-expiratory Pressure during One Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study

Article

Last updated: 24 Dec 2024

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pulmonary problems from thoracic procedures are more likely to occur, which may lead to higher morbidity, a longer hospital stay, higher expenses, and a higher fatality rate. Objective: This study was done to compare efficacy of using either individualized or the conventional positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for one-lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was done on 116 patients of age between 18 and 70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II to Ш of either sex who underwent elective thoracic surgeries using one-lung ventilation. Patients were allocated randomly to either conventional PEEP group in which patients underwent thoracic surgeries using conventional PEEP (5 cmH2O) or individualized PEEP group in which patients underwent thoracic surgeries using individualized optimal PEEP which produces the best static lung compliance. Results: The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) was lower in individualized PEEP group (12.1%) compared to conventional PEEP group (34.5%) with p (0.004). The most common complication incidence was lung collapse, which was greater in the conventional PEEP group (10.3%) than in the individualized PEEP group (27.6%). Arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio was greater in the individualized compared to conventional PEEP group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in incidence of pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, ARDS, or pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: Using individualized PEEP in patients receiving one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgeries resulted in decreased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, lower postoperative lung aeration score, better intraoperative respiratory mechanics, and oxygenation with no significant changes in hemodynamics.  

DOI

10.21608/ejhm.2022.262314

Keywords

Individualized PEEP, Conventional PEEP, One Lung Ventilation, Pulmonary Complications

Authors

First Name

Mohammed A.M.

Last Name

Hegazy

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Hamed H. M.

Last Name

Neamatallah

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohammed A.A.

Last Name

Sultan

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

-

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

salwa

Last Name

Hayes

MiddleName

M S

Affiliation

Department of anesthesia ,intensive care and pain management, faculty of medicine Mansoura University

Email

salwa.hayes@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

89

Article Issue

1

Related Issue

36332

Issue Date

2022-10-01

Receive Date

2022-09-30

Publish Date

2022-10-01

Page Start

5,301

Page End

5,309

Print ISSN

1687-2002

Online ISSN

2090-7125

Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_262314.html

Detail API

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=262314

Order

181

Type

Original Article

Type Code

606

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

Publication Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Individualized versus Conventional Positive End-expiratory Pressure during One Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023