Beta
43986

Comparative Study Between Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Induction and Maintenance Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Bariatric Operations

Article

Last updated: 03 Jan 2025

Subjects

-

Tags

-

Abstract

Background: Morbid obesity is defined as a body weight 160% above the ideal weight for survival or 40 kg/m2 or >35 with serious comorbidity. Long-term surveys revealed that surgical intervention has been the only method to effectively sustain weight loss in these patients. Objectives: To compare total intravenous anesthesia applied with propofol-fentanyl to sevoflurane single breath and maintenance anesthesia. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized clinical study was approved by the ethics committee in AlAzhar University and a written informed patient's consent was obtained. This study included 50 patients of both sexes, admitted for bariatric surgery carried out at Al-Azhar University Hospitals (El-Hussein and Bab El-Sharia). They were randomly allocated into two equal groups, TIVA group: 25 patients will receive total intravenous anesthesia applied with propofol-fentanyl. Group VIMA: sevoflurane single breath induction and maintenance group: 25 patients will receive - sevoflurane single breath induction and maintenance. Results: Total intravenous anesthesia using (fentanyl and propofol). Volatile induction and maintenance anesthesia (Inhalational anesthesia) using (fentanyl and sevoflurane). The following parameters were assessed between the 2 groups: Hemodynamics, SPo2 and ET Co2 were continuously monitored and recorded at 15 min interval. Conclusion: This study showed that both TIVA and VIMA were effective in bariatric surgeries. Regarding neuroendocrine stress response, TIVA group was provided suppressed hormone levels suggesting that there was suppression of stress response unlike VIMA group that showed even raised serum levels of those hormones.

DOI

10.21608/ejhm.2019.43986

Keywords

total intravenous anesthesia, volatile induction, maintenance anesthesia, Sevoflurane, bariatric operations

Authors

First Name

Anwar Mohamed Mostafa

Last Name

Alhasanin

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mostafa Mohamed Mohamed

Last Name

El-Sayed

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

-

City

-

Orcid

-

First Name

Mohamed Abd El Nasser Zaki

Last Name

Basiouny

MiddleName

-

Affiliation

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University

Email

mohamedassassy@yahoo.com

City

-

Orcid

-

Volume

76

Article Issue

6

Related Issue

6840

Issue Date

2019-07-01

Receive Date

2019-08-05

Publish Date

2019-07-01

Page Start

4,319

Page End

4,324

Print ISSN

1687-2002

Online ISSN

2090-7125

Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_43986.html

Detail API

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/service?article_code=43986

Order

12

Type

Original Article

Type Code

606

Publication Type

Journal

Publication Title

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

Publication Link

https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/

MainTitle

Comparative Study Between Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Volatile Induction and Maintenance Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Bariatric Operations

Details

Type

Article

Created At

22 Jan 2023